From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp08.au.ibm.com (e23smtp08.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 601A11A0060 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:35:13 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp08.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:35:13 +1000 Received: from d23relay06.au.ibm.com (d23relay06.au.ibm.com [9.185.63.219]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407D33578058 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:35:10 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay06.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sB95Z2np39780380 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:35:10 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sB95Ybji012945 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:34:37 +1100 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (ozlabs.au.ibm.com [9.192.253.14]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id sB95YbaN012486 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:34:37 +1100 Received: from localhost (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.253.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80CEDA019A for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:34:13 +1100 (AEDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Ian Munsie To: linuxppc-dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] CXL: Fix leaking interrupts if attach process fails In-reply-to: <1418026681-14787-3-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> References: <1418026681-14787-1-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> <1418026681-14787-3-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:34:13 +1100 Message-Id: <1418103120-sup-2848@delenn.ozlabs.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , This one would be nice to go to stable, but I'm not sure if it's critical enough to justify it since it only reduces the number of available interrupts (and therefore, contexts) that can be used by the card (so, maybe you can only run 507 contexts simultaneously instead of 509)... Cheers, -Ian