From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (e23smtp09.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 959CE1A006D for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:39:24 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:39:24 +1000 Received: from d23relay08.au.ibm.com (d23relay08.au.ibm.com [9.185.71.33]) by d23dlp02.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AC52BB0057 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:39:21 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay08.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sB95dL1841222256 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:39:21 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sB95dLmf006365 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:39:21 +1100 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (ozlabs.au.ibm.com [9.192.253.14]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id sB95dKAI006358 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:39:20 +1100 Received: from localhost (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.253.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B45AAA019A for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:39:20 +1100 (AEDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Ian Munsie To: linuxppc-dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] CXL: Disable AFU debug flag In-reply-to: <1418026681-14787-5-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> References: <1418026681-14787-1-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> <1418026681-14787-5-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:39:20 +1100 Message-Id: <1418103265-sup-9241@delenn.ozlabs.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , This one would be nice to go to stable, but I'm not sure it really meets the rules. It could be a problem for userspace error paths checking the result of MMIO reads, but only if the AFU has actually been unexpectedly disabled somehow yet the PSL is still responding... I don't think this is a high priority to go to stable unless it starts causing problems for someone. Cheers, -Ian