From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0123.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E1AE1A09C8 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:04:58 +1100 (AEDT) Message-ID: <1418159084.5581.32.camel@freescale.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 1/4] powerpc: drop the ability to tweak SMT mode at boot time From: Scott Wood To: Michael Ellerman Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:04:44 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1418098262.527.1.camel@concordia> References: <20141205150405.11028.27445.stgit@bahia.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com> <20141205151341.11028.47570.stgit@bahia.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com> <1417805565.334.15.camel@freescale.com> <1418098262.527.1.camel@concordia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Greg Kurz List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 15:11 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 12:52 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 16:14 +0100, Greg Kurz wrote: > > > The smt-enabled kernel parameter basically leaves unwanted cpus executing > > > in firmware or wherever they happen to be. The very same applies to the > > > ibm,smt-enabled DT property which is no more used by anything known. These > > > are hacks that shoudn't be used in a production environment. > > > > > > Quoting mpe, "there are better ways for firmware to disable SMT". > > > > Those "better ways" don't apply to Freescale chips, where the OS enables > > (or not) SMT without any interaction with firmware. > > But how does it know there even are SMT threads? From the device tree? So > just don't present the threads in the device tree? The device tree is for hardware description, not configuration... -Scott