From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] ppc/kvm: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:58:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421312314-72330-2-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421312314-72330-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)
Change the ppc/kvm code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c | 8 ++++----
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c | 16 ++++++++--------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c
index 7b066f6..7c22997 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_xics.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static void icp_rm_down_cppr(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp,
* in virtual mode.
*/
do {
- old_state = new_state = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state);
+ old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state);
/* Down_CPPR */
new_state.cppr = new_cppr;
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ unsigned long kvmppc_rm_h_xirr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* pending priority
*/
do {
- old_state = new_state = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state);
+ old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state);
xirr = old_state.xisr | (((u32)old_state.cppr) << 24);
if (!old_state.xisr)
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ int kvmppc_rm_h_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long server,
* whenever the MFRR is made less favored.
*/
do {
- old_state = new_state = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state);
+ old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state);
/* Set_MFRR */
new_state.mfrr = mfrr;
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ int kvmppc_rm_h_cppr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cppr)
icp_rm_clr_vcpu_irq(icp->vcpu);
do {
- old_state = new_state = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state);
+ old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state);
reject = 0;
new_state.cppr = cppr;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c
index 807351f..a4a8d9f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static bool icp_try_to_deliver(struct kvmppc_icp *icp, u32 irq, u8 priority,
icp->server_num);
do {
- old_state = new_state = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state);
+ old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state);
*reject = 0;
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static void icp_down_cppr(struct kvmppc_xics *xics, struct kvmppc_icp *icp,
* in virtual mode.
*/
do {
- old_state = new_state = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state);
+ old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state);
/* Down_CPPR */
new_state.cppr = new_cppr;
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static noinline unsigned long kvmppc_h_xirr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* pending priority
*/
do {
- old_state = new_state = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state);
+ old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state);
xirr = old_state.xisr | (((u32)old_state.cppr) << 24);
if (!old_state.xisr)
@@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static noinline int kvmppc_h_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long server,
* whenever the MFRR is made less favored.
*/
do {
- old_state = new_state = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state);
+ old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state);
/* Set_MFRR */
new_state.mfrr = mfrr;
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ static int kvmppc_h_ipoll(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long server)
if (!icp)
return H_PARAMETER;
}
- state = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state);
+ state = READ_ONCE(icp->state);
kvmppc_set_gpr(vcpu, 4, ((u32)state.cppr << 24) | state.xisr);
kvmppc_set_gpr(vcpu, 5, state.mfrr);
return H_SUCCESS;
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ static noinline void kvmppc_h_cppr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cppr)
BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL_LEVEL);
do {
- old_state = new_state = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state);
+ old_state = new_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state);
reject = 0;
new_state.cppr = cppr;
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ static int xics_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *private)
if (!icp)
continue;
- state.raw = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state.raw);
+ state.raw = READ_ONCE(icp->state.raw);
seq_printf(m, "cpu server %#lx XIRR:%#x PPRI:%#x CPPR:%#x MFRR:%#x OUT:%d NR:%d\n",
icp->server_num, state.xisr,
state.pending_pri, state.cppr, state.mfrr,
@@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@ int kvmppc_xics_set_icp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 icpval)
* the ICS states before the ICP states.
*/
do {
- old_state = ACCESS_ONCE(icp->state);
+ old_state = READ_ONCE(icp->state);
if (new_state.mfrr <= old_state.mfrr) {
resend = false;
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-15 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-15 8:58 [PATCH 0/8] current ACCESS_ONCE patch queue Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-15 8:58 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2015-01-15 23:09 ` [PATCH 1/8] ppc/kvm: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE Michael Ellerman
2015-01-16 9:43 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-15 8:58 ` [PATCH 2/8] ppc/hugetlbfs: " Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-15 8:58 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/xen/p2m: " Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-15 9:26 ` Jürgen Groß
2015-01-15 10:43 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2015-01-15 11:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-15 8:58 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/spinlock: Leftover conversion ACCESS_ONCE->READ_ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-15 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-15 19:51 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-15 20:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-15 21:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-15 8:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/gup: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-15 8:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] kernel: tighten rules for ACCESS ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-15 8:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] next: sh: Fix compile error Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-15 8:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] kernel: Fix sparse warning for ACCESS_ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2015-01-16 12:12 ` [PATCH 0/8] current ACCESS_ONCE patch queue Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421312314-72330-2-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).