From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Cc: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Aaron Sierra <asierra@xes-inc.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl_pci: Fix pci stack build bug with FRAME_WARN
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:31:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421800292.4961.215.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150120140349.a7a9885065c241b555b91717@freescale.com>
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 14:03 -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> Fix this:
>
> CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.o
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c: In function 'fsl_pcie_check_link':
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c:91:1: error: the frame size of 1360 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
>
> when configuring FRAME_WARN, by converting the allocation from the
> stack to the heap. We use GFP_ATOMIC since this function can be
> called with interrupts disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
> index 6455c1e..635d743 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
> @@ -69,11 +69,13 @@ static int fsl_pcie_check_link(struct pci_controller *hose)
>
> if (hose->indirect_type & PPC_INDIRECT_TYPE_FSL_CFG_REG_LINK) {
> if (hose->ops->read == fsl_indirect_read_config) {
> - struct pci_bus bus;
> - bus.number = hose->first_busno;
> - bus.sysdata = hose;
> - bus.ops = hose->ops;
> - indirect_read_config(&bus, 0, PCIE_LTSSM, 4, &val);
> + struct pci_bus *bus;
> + bus = kmalloc(sizeof(*bus), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + bus->number = hose->first_busno;
Missing check for allocation failure.
Do we not have a real struct pci_bus we can use here? Or refactor
indirect_read_config() to take hose and bus number instead?
If putting a pci_bus struct on the stack is no longer OK, then
fake_pci_bus() should be fixed as well. I wonder if GCC is allocating
separate pci_bus structs on the stack for this one and the one that
early_read_config_dword() uses...
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-21 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 20:03 [PATCH] powerpc/fsl_pci: Fix pci stack build bug with FRAME_WARN Kim Phillips
2015-01-21 0:31 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2015-01-22 2:48 ` Kim Phillips
2015-01-22 3:02 ` Scott Wood
2015-01-23 0:20 ` Kim Phillips
2015-01-23 0:43 ` Scott Wood
2015-01-23 1:05 ` [PATCH v2] " Kim Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421800292.4961.215.camel@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=asierra@xes-inc.com \
--cc=dongsheng.wang@freescale.com \
--cc=himangi774@gmail.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).