From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: Ryan Grimm <grimm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CXL: Fix device_node reference counting
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:07:45 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1422425265.11009.1.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422423577-sup-6588@delenn.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 16:53 +1100, Ian Munsie wrote:
> Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of 2015-01-28 16:04:40 +1100:
> > > I just wanted to check the status of this one? I can't see it in your
> > > tree and wanted to make sure you didn't simply miss it.
> >
> > It looked fishy, but I never got around to replying.
> >
> > The second sentence in the explanation should never be true:
>
> Right, that was the point of the fix ;)
Sure, but bodging of_node_get()s all over the place is not a path to success.
> > You shouldn't have np unless you did an of_node_get() to get it, otherwise it's
> > pointing at something you don't have a reference for and it might go away at
> > any time.
> >
> > So the patch may fix the bug but I don't think it's correct.
> >
> > I think pnv_pci_to_phb_node() should be doing a get for you, before returning
> > the pointer.
>
> Agreed - we should probably also rename it to have 'get' in the name,
> like pnv_pci_get_phb_node().
Yep.
> > See as a comparison pcibios_get_phb_of_node().
>
> We could almost use that instead, except it's not exported for modules
> and I'm not sure if that even works with __weak functions?
It should. It's only weak until the final link and then you get a non-weak
version AIUI.
Try it.
And a follow up patch to have it use pci_bus_to_host() would be nice too.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-28 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-07 5:41 [PATCH] CXL: Fix device_node reference counting Ian Munsie
2015-01-28 4:02 ` Ian Munsie
2015-01-28 5:04 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-01-28 5:53 ` Ian Munsie
2015-01-28 6:07 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2015-01-29 2:15 ` Ryan Grimm
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-29 2:16 Ryan Grimm
2015-01-29 2:50 ` Ian Munsie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1422425265.11009.1.camel@ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=grimm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=imunsie@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).