From: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>
To: <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<bigeasy@linutronix.de>, <agraf@suse.de>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: scottwood@freescale.com, mihai.caraman@freescale.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/kvm: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:32:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1424251955-308-2-git-send-email-bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424251955-308-1-git-send-email-bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>
This patch enables running intensive I/O workloads, e.g. netperf, in a guest
deployed on a RT host. It also enable guests to be SMP.
The openpic spinlock becomes a sleeping mutex on a RT system. This no longer
guarantees that EPR is atomic with exception delivery. The guest VCPU thread
fails due to a BUG_ON(preemptible()) when running netperf.
In order to make the kvmppc_mpic_set_epr() call safe on RT from non-atomic
context, convert the openpic lock to a raw_spinlock. A similar approach can
be seen for x86 platforms in the following commit [1].
Here are some comparative cyclitest measurements run inside a high priority RT
guest run on a RT host. The guest has 1 VCPU and the test has been run for 15
minutes. The guest runs ~750 hackbench processes as background stress.
spinlock raw_spinlock
Min latency (us) 4 4
Avg latency (us) 15 19
Max latency (us) 70 62
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/11/289
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com>
Reviewed-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c
index 39b3a8f..9fad0aa 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ struct openpic {
int num_mmio_regions;
gpa_t reg_base;
- spinlock_t lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
/* Behavior control */
struct fsl_mpic_info *fsl;
@@ -1108,9 +1108,9 @@ static int openpic_cpu_write_internal(void *opaque, gpa_t addr,
mpic_irq_raise(opp, dst, ILR_INTTGT_INT);
}
- spin_unlock(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&opp->lock);
kvm_notify_acked_irq(opp->kvm, 0, notify_eoi);
- spin_lock(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&opp->lock);
break;
}
@@ -1185,12 +1185,12 @@ void kvmppc_mpic_set_epr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int cpu = vcpu->arch.irq_cpu_id;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&opp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&opp->lock, flags);
if ((opp->gcr & opp->mpic_mode_mask) == GCR_MODE_PROXY)
kvmppc_set_epr(vcpu, openpic_iack(opp, &opp->dst[cpu], cpu));
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&opp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&opp->lock, flags);
}
static int openpic_cpu_read_internal(void *opaque, gpa_t addr,
@@ -1390,9 +1390,9 @@ static int kvm_mpic_read(struct kvm_io_device *this, gpa_t addr,
return -EINVAL;
}
- spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
ret = kvm_mpic_read_internal(opp, addr - opp->reg_base, &u.val);
- spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
/*
* Technically only 32-bit accesses are allowed, but be nice to
@@ -1430,10 +1430,10 @@ static int kvm_mpic_write(struct kvm_io_device *this, gpa_t addr,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
- spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
ret = kvm_mpic_write_internal(opp, addr - opp->reg_base,
*(const u32 *)ptr);
- spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
pr_debug("%s: addr %llx ret %d val %x\n",
__func__, addr, ret, *(const u32 *)ptr);
@@ -1504,14 +1504,14 @@ static int access_reg(struct openpic *opp, gpa_t addr, u32 *val, int type)
if (addr & 3)
return -ENXIO;
- spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
if (type == ATTR_SET)
ret = kvm_mpic_write_internal(opp, addr, *val);
else
ret = kvm_mpic_read_internal(opp, addr, val);
- spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
pr_debug("%s: type %d addr %llx val %x\n", __func__, type, addr, *val);
@@ -1548,9 +1548,9 @@ static int mpic_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
if (attr32 != 0 && attr32 != 1)
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
openpic_set_irq(opp, attr->attr, attr32);
- spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -1595,9 +1595,9 @@ static int mpic_get_attr(struct kvm_device *dev, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
if (attr->attr > MAX_SRC)
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
attr32 = opp->src[attr->attr].pending;
- spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
if (put_user(attr32, (u32 __user *)(long)attr->addr))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ static int mpic_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
opp->kvm = dev->kvm;
opp->dev = dev;
opp->model = type;
- spin_lock_init(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&opp->lock);
add_mmio_region(opp, &openpic_gbl_mmio);
add_mmio_region(opp, &openpic_tmr_mmio);
@@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ int kvmppc_mpic_connect_vcpu(struct kvm_device *dev, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (cpu < 0 || cpu >= MAX_CPU)
return -EPERM;
- spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&opp->lock);
if (opp->dst[cpu].vcpu) {
ret = -EEXIST;
@@ -1769,7 +1769,7 @@ int kvmppc_mpic_connect_vcpu(struct kvm_device *dev, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
vcpu->arch.epr_flags |= KVMPPC_EPR_KERNEL;
out:
- spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -1799,9 +1799,9 @@ static int mpic_set_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
struct openpic *opp = kvm->arch.mpic;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&opp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&opp->lock, flags);
openpic_set_irq(opp, irq, level);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&opp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&opp->lock, flags);
/* All code paths we care about don't check for the return value */
return 0;
@@ -1813,14 +1813,14 @@ int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
struct openpic *opp = kvm->arch.mpic;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&opp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&opp->lock, flags);
/*
* XXX We ignore the target address for now, as we only support
* a single MSI bank.
*/
openpic_msi_write(kvm->arch.mpic, MSIIR_OFFSET, e->msi.data);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&opp->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&opp->lock, flags);
/* All code paths we care about don't check for the return value */
return 0;
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-18 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-18 9:32 [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/kvm: Enable running guests on RT Linux Bogdan Purcareata
2015-02-18 9:32 ` Bogdan Purcareata [this message]
2015-02-23 22:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/kvm: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock Scott Wood
2015-02-18 9:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/kvm: Limit MAX_VCPUS for guests running on RT Linux Bogdan Purcareata
2015-02-18 9:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 13:45 ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-23 22:48 ` Scott Wood
2015-02-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/kvm: Enable running guests " Alexander Graf
2015-02-20 14:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 14:16 ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-20 14:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 14:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 15:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20 15:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-20 15:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-23 8:12 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23 7:50 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23 7:29 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-02-23 23:27 ` Scott Wood
2015-02-25 16:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-26 13:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-26 13:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-27 1:05 ` Scott Wood
2015-02-27 13:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-27 17:07 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-02 23:11 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-03 8:07 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-03 21:26 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-09 7:44 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-09 23:53 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-20 10:53 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-21 0:52 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-22 12:06 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-23 0:30 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-23 12:31 ` Purcareata Bogdan
2015-04-23 21:26 ` Scott Wood
2015-04-27 6:45 ` Purcareata Bogdan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1424251955-308-2-git-send-email-bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com \
--to=bogdan.purcareata@freescale.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mihai.caraman@freescale.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).