From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com (e23smtp07.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E6E1A0E3E for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:26:29 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp07.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:26:26 +1000 Received: from d23relay08.au.ibm.com (d23relay08.au.ibm.com [9.185.71.33]) by d23dlp01.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8C22CE8040 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:26:23 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay08.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t1O8QEF745350988 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:26:23 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t1O8Pnva002616 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:25:49 +1100 Message-ID: <1424766317.12891.32.camel@au1.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 08/17] powrepc/pci: Refactor pci_dn From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Bjorn Helgaas Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:25:17 +1100 In-Reply-To: <20150224081330.GE6220@google.com> References: <20150113180502.GC2776@google.com> <1421288887-7765-1-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1421288887-7765-9-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150220231917.GC21131@google.com> <20150223001349.GA7522@shangw> <20150224081330.GE6220@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Wei Yang , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Gavin Shan List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 02:13 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Ah, yes, now I see the problem. I don't really like having to export > pci_iov_virtfn_bus() and pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(), but it's probably not > worth the hassle of changing it, and I think adding more pcibios > interfaces > would be even worse. Aren't we going to eventually turn them all into host bridge ops ? :-) Cheers, Ben.