From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0119.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B69741A0AB3 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 09:45:42 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <1428450326.22867.486.camel@freescale.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] powerpc/fsl-booke: Add T1024 RDB board support From: Scott Wood To: Shengzhou Liu Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 18:45:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1428057350-33553-3-git-send-email-Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com> References: <1428057350-33553-1-git-send-email-Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com> <1428057350-33553-3-git-send-email-Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 18:35 +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote: > + board-control@2,0 { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + compatible = "fsl,t1024-cpld", "fsl,deepsleep-cpld"; No "fsl,deepsleep-cpld". Just have the driver recognize the compatibles for the chips that have deep sleep. Even if you were to do this, it would need to be documented in a binding, and you'd need to be more specific about what CPLD family you're talking about. > + tdma: ucc@2000 { > + compatible = "fsl,ucc-tdm"; > + rx-clock-name = "clk8"; > + tx-clock-name = "clk9"; > + fsl,rx-sync-clock = "rsync_pin"; > + fsl,tx-sync-clock = "tsync_pin"; > + fsl,tx-timeslot = <0xfffffffe>; > + fsl,rx-timeslot = <0xfffffffe>; > + fsl,tdm-framer-type = "e1"; > + fsl,tdm-mode = "normal"; > + fsl,tdm-id = <0>; > + fsl,siram-entry-id = <0>; > + }; Binding? -Scott