From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0105.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C54B1A019F for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:51:46 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <1429059092.22867.713.camel@freescale.com> Subject: Re: [v3, 01/11] powerpc/8xx: remove remaining unnecessary code in FixupDAR From: Scott Wood To: leroy christophe Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 19:51:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <552C40EB.2000407@c-s.fr> References: <20150203113816.E77811A5F13@localhost.localdomain> <20150326213215.GA21815@home.buserror.net> <552A9A5D.4070208@c-s.fr> <1428956804.22867.632.camel@freescale.com> <552C40EB.2000407@c-s.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 00:19 +0200, leroy christophe wrote: > > Le 13/04/2015 22:26, Scott Wood a écrit : > > On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 18:16 +0200, leroy christophe wrote: > >> Le 26/03/2015 22:32, Scott Wood a écrit : > >>> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:38:16PM +0100, LEROY Christophe wrote: > >>>> Since commit 33fb845a6f01 ("powerpc/8xx: Don't use MD_TWC for walk"), MD_EPN and > >>>> MD_TWC are not writen anymore in FixupDAR so saving r3 has become useless. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy > >>>> --- > >>>> v2: no change > >>>> v3: no change > >>> This doesn't apply cleanly. > >>> > >>> > >> You already applied part of that patchset it in your next tree, > >> including that one (commit 2374d0a). > >> You told me to re-submit a patchset with only the remaining ones, > >> therefore I sent v4 on the 4th of Feb, based on your tree. > > OK. I applied v2, and didn't remember that when I came across v3 in > > patchwork. > > > > > What about v4 (the remaining ones) ? You got comments on the last one of > the set, have you applied the other ones or shall I re-sumbit a full v5 ? I haven't applied them yet. -Scott