linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org,
	anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jolsa@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 12:59:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <142c15f3-d70a-32f9-49a0-2f250fbf0e7d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589967933-1503-3-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>



On 5/20/20 3:15 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
> with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
> the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
> in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
> version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [Decide extended mask at run time based on platform]
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>   tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 ++++++-
>   tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h     |  5 ++-
>   tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c        | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index f599064..485b1d5 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
>   	PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
>   	PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
>   	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
> -	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
> +	/* Extended registers */
> +	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
> +	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
> +	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
> +	/* Max regs without the extended regs */
> +	PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
>   };
> +
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK	((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
> +
> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300   (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) \
> +				- PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
> +
>   #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> index e18a355..46ed00d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> @@ -64,7 +64,10 @@
>   	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DAR] = "dar",
>   	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR] = "dsisr",
>   	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER] = "sier",
> -	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra"
> +	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra",
> +	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
> +	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
> +	[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
>   };
>
>   static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> index 0a52429..9179230 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -6,9 +6,14 @@
>
>   #include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
>   #include "../../../util/debug.h"
> +#include "../../../util/event.h"
> +#include "../../../util/header.h"
> +#include "../../../perf-sys.h"
>
>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>
> +#define PVR_POWER9		0x004E
> +
>   const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
>   	SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
>   	SMPL_REG(r1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R1),
> @@ -55,6 +60,9 @@
>   	SMPL_REG(dsisr, PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR),
>   	SMPL_REG(sier, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER),
>   	SMPL_REG(mmcra, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA),
> +	SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
> +	SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
> +	SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
>   	SMPL_REG_END
>   };
>
> @@ -163,3 +171,50 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op)
>
>   	return SDT_ARG_VALID;
>   }
> +
> +uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
> +{
> +	struct perf_event_attr attr = {
> +		.type                   = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
> +		.config                 = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
> +		.sample_type            = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR,
> +		.precise_ip             = 1,
> +		.disabled               = 1,
> +		.exclude_kernel         = 1,
> +	};
> +	int fd, ret;
> +	char buffer[64];
> +	u32 version;
> +	u64 extended_mask = 0;
> +
> +	/* Get the PVR value to set the extended
> +	 * mask specific to platform
> +	 */
> +	get_cpuid(buffer, sizeof(buffer));
> +	ret = sscanf(buffer, "%u,", &version);
> +
> +	if (ret != 1) {
> +		pr_debug("Failed to get the processor version, unable to output extended registers\n");
> +		return PERF_REGS_MASK;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (version == PVR_POWER9)
> +		extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
> +	else
> +		return PERF_REGS_MASK;
> +
> +	attr.sample_regs_intr = extended_mask;
> +	attr.sample_period = 1;
> +	event_attr_init(&attr);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before
> +	 * returning the register mask to sample.
> +	 */
> +	fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
> +	if (fd != -1) {
> +		close(fd);
> +		return (extended_mask | PERF_REGS_MASK);
> +	}
> +	return PERF_REGS_MASK;
> +}


      reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-20  9:45 [PATCH V3 0/2] powerpc/perf: Add support for perf extended regs in powerpc Athira Rajeev
2020-05-20  9:45 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs Athira Rajeev
2020-05-26  7:28   ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2020-05-20  9:45 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc Athira Rajeev
2020-05-26  7:29   ` Madhavan Srinivasan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=142c15f3-d70a-32f9-49a0-2f250fbf0e7d@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).