From: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH V5 07/10] powerpc/powernv: Support EEH reset for VFs
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 21:37:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431697024-5710-8-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431697024-5710-1-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Before VF PE is introduced, there isn't a method to reset an individual PCI
function. And since skiboot firmware is not aware of the VF, the VF's reset
should be done in kernel.
This patch introduces a function pnv_eeh_vf_pe_reset() to do the FLR or AF
FLR to a VF.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
index c1fde48..3d64cf3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ struct eeh_dev {
int pcix_cap; /* Saved PCIx capability */
int pcie_cap; /* Saved PCIe capability */
int aer_cap; /* Saved AER capability */
+ int af_cap; /* Saved AF capability */
struct eeh_pe *pe; /* Associated PE */
struct list_head list; /* Form link list in the PE */
struct pci_controller *phb; /* Associated PHB */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
index c4ea2ad..2a224b2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-powernv.c
@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ static void *pnv_eeh_probe(struct pci_dn *pdn, void *data)
edev->pcix_cap = pnv_eeh_find_cap(pdn, PCI_CAP_ID_PCIX);
edev->pcie_cap = pnv_eeh_find_cap(pdn, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
edev->aer_cap = pnv_eeh_find_ecap(pdn, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ERR);
+ edev->af_cap = pnv_eeh_find_cap(pdn, PCI_CAP_ID_AF);
if ((edev->class_code >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI) {
edev->mode |= EEH_DEV_BRIDGE;
if (edev->pcie_cap) {
@@ -891,6 +892,123 @@ static int pnv_eeh_bridge_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int option)
return 0;
}
+static bool pnv_eeh_wait_for_pending(struct pci_dn *pdn, int pos, u16 mask)
+{
+ int i;
+ u32 status;
+
+ /* Wait for Transaction Pending bit clean */
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+ if (i)
+ msleep((1 << (i - 1)) * 100);
+
+ eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, pos, 2, &status);
+ if (!(status & mask))
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static int pnv_eeh_do_flr(struct pci_dn *pdn, int option)
+{
+ u32 cap;
+ struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
+
+ if (!edev->pcie_cap)
+ return -ENOTTY;
+
+ eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP, 4, &cap);
+ if (!(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_FLR))
+ return -ENOTTY;
+
+ if (!pnv_eeh_wait_for_pending(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVSTA,
+ PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_TRPND))
+ pr_warn("%s: Pending transaction while issuing FLR to "
+ "%04x:%02x:%02x.%01x\n",
+ __func__, edev->phb->global_number, pdn->busno,
+ PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn));
+
+ eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, 4, &cap);
+ if (option == EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE)
+ cap &= ~PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_BCR_FLR;
+ else
+ cap |= PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_BCR_FLR;
+ eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, 4, cap);
+ if (option == EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE)
+ msleep(EEH_PE_RST_SETTLE_TIME);
+ else
+ msleep(EEH_PE_RST_HOLD_TIME);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int pnv_eeh_do_af_flr(struct pci_dn *pdn, int option)
+{
+ u32 cap;
+ struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
+
+ if (!edev->af_cap)
+ return -ENOTTY;
+
+ eeh_ops->read_config(pdn, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CAP, 1, &cap);
+ if (!(cap & PCI_AF_CAP_TP) || !(cap & PCI_AF_CAP_FLR))
+ return -ENOTTY;
+
+ /*
+ * Wait for Transaction Pending bit to clear. A word-aligned test
+ * is used, so we use the conrol offset rather than status and shift
+ * the test bit to match.
+ */
+ if (!pnv_eeh_wait_for_pending(pdn, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CTRL,
+ PCI_AF_STATUS_TP << 8))
+ pr_warn("%s: Pending transaction while issuing AF FLR to "
+ "%04x:%02x:%02x.%01x\n",
+ __func__, edev->phb->global_number, pdn->busno,
+ PCI_SLOT(pdn->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pdn->devfn));
+
+ if (option == EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE)
+ eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CTRL, 1, 0);
+ else
+ eeh_ops->write_config(pdn, edev->af_cap + PCI_AF_CTRL, 1,
+ PCI_AF_CTRL_FLR);
+ if (option == EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE)
+ msleep(EEH_PE_RST_SETTLE_TIME);
+ else
+ msleep(EEH_PE_RST_HOLD_TIME);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int pnv_eeh_reset_vf(struct pci_dn *pdn, int option)
+{
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = pnv_eeh_do_flr(pdn, option);
+ if (rc != -ENOTTY)
+ return rc;
+
+ rc = pnv_eeh_do_af_flr(pdn, option);
+ if (rc != -ENOTTY)
+ return rc;
+
+ return -ENOTTY;
+}
+
+static int pnv_eeh_vf_pe_reset(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option)
+{
+ struct eeh_dev *edev, *tmp;
+ struct pci_dn *pdn;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ eeh_pe_for_each_dev(pe, edev, tmp) {
+ pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
+ ret |= pnv_eeh_reset_vf(pdn, option);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
void pnv_pci_reset_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
struct pci_controller *hose;
@@ -966,7 +1084,9 @@ static int pnv_eeh_reset(struct eeh_pe *pe, int option)
}
bus = eeh_pe_bus_get(pe);
- if (pci_is_root_bus(bus) ||
+ if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF)
+ ret = pnv_eeh_vf_pe_reset(pe, option);
+ else if (pci_is_root_bus(bus) ||
pci_is_root_bus(bus->parent))
ret = pnv_eeh_root_reset(hose, option);
else
@@ -1106,6 +1226,13 @@ static inline bool pnv_eeh_cfg_blocked(struct pci_dn *pdn)
if (!edev || !edev->pe)
return false;
+ /*
+ * For VF's reset operation, we need to rely on the kernel to
+ * do those PCI config operations since firmware isn't aware of VFs.
+ */
+ if ((edev->physfn) && (edev->pe->state & EEH_PE_RESET))
+ return false;
+
if (edev->pe->state & EEH_PE_CFG_BLOCKED)
return true;
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-15 13:36 [PATCH V5 00/10] VF EEH on Power8 Wei Yang
2015-05-15 13:36 ` [PATCH V5 01/10] pci/iov: rename and export virtfn_add/virtfn_remove Wei Yang
2015-05-15 13:36 ` [PATCH V5 02/10] powerpc/pci_dn: cache vf_index in pci_dn Wei Yang
2015-05-15 13:36 ` [PATCH V5 03/10] powerpc/pci: remove PCI devices in reverse order Wei Yang
2015-05-15 13:36 ` [PATCH V5 04/10] powerpc/eeh: cache address range just for normal device Wei Yang
2015-05-15 13:36 ` [PATCH V5 05/10] powerpc/powernv: create/release eeh_dev for VF Wei Yang
2015-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCH V5 06/10] powerpc/eeh: create EEH_PE_VF for VF PE Wei Yang
2015-05-15 13:37 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2015-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCH V5 08/10] powerpc/powernv: Support PCI config restore for VFs Wei Yang
2015-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCH V5 09/10] powerpc/eeh: handle VF PE properly Wei Yang
2015-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCH V5 10/10] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431697024-5710-8-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).