From: Michael Neuling <michael.neuling@au1.ibm.com>
To: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Neelesh Gupta <neelegup@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Disable rtc-alarms when opal doesn't support tpo
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:25:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436325916.13169.23.camel@au1.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433307087-11503-1-git-send-email-vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Disable rtc-alarms when opal doesn't support tpo
I'd prefer to avoid the double negative and extra words. ie.
rtc/opal: Enable alarms only when opal supports tpo
But looks good other than that.
Acked-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 10:21 +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> rtc-opal driver provides support for rtc alarms via
> times-power-on(tpo). However some platforms like BML use a fake rtc
> clock and don't support tpo. Such platforms are indicated by the missing
> 'has-tpo' property in the device tree.
>=20
> Current implementation however enables callback for
> rtc_class_ops.read/set alarm irrespective of the tpo support from the
> platform. This results in a failed opal call when kernel tries to read
> an existing alarms via opal_get_tpo_time during rtc device registration.
>=20
> This patch fixes this issue by setting opal_rtc_ops.read/set_alarm
> callback pointers only when tpo is supported.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
> index 7061dca..1125641 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
> @@ -190,11 +190,9 @@ exit:
> return rc;
> }
> =20
> -static const struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops =3D {
> +static struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops =3D {
> .read_time =3D opal_get_rtc_time,
> .set_time =3D opal_set_rtc_time,
> - .read_alarm =3D opal_get_tpo_time,
> - .set_alarm =3D opal_set_tpo_time,
> };
> =20
> static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -202,8 +200,11 @@ static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pd=
ev)
> struct rtc_device *rtc;
> =20
> if (pdev->dev.of_node && of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "has-tpo",
> - NULL))
> + NULL)) {
> device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, true);
> + opal_rtc_ops.read_alarm =3D opal_get_tpo_time;
> + opal_rtc_ops.set_alarm =3D opal_set_tpo_time;
> + }
> =20
> rtc =3D devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, DRVNAME, &opal_rtc_ops,
> THIS_MODULE);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 4:51 [PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Disable rtc-alarms when opal doesn't support tpo Vaibhav Jain
2015-06-03 5:34 ` Neelesh Gupta
2015-07-08 3:25 ` Michael Neuling [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1436325916.13169.23.camel@au1.ibm.com \
--to=michael.neuling@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=neelegup@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).