From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bbn0102.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.111.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7411A1A37 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:28:17 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <1436326077.2658.65.camel@freescale.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rheap: move rheap.c from arch/powerpc/lib/ to lib/ From: Scott Wood To: Zhao Qiang-B45475 CC: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "Xie Xiaobo-R63061" Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 22:27:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1432717920-43563-1-git-send-email-B45475@freescale.com> <1432717920-43563-2-git-send-email-B45475@freescale.com> <1432748213.4089.23.camel@freescale.com> <1433398423.3415.34.camel@freescale.com> <1433457659.31070.2.camel@freescale.com> <1436324117.2658.64.camel@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 22:26 -0500, Zhao Qiang-B45475 wrote: > Now the point is, genalloc is not so proper to qe muram while rheap is > written to manage muram, rheap is not specific to muram. > if use genalloc instead of rheap, there will be amounts of work to do. Not much. I think I've spent more time responding to continual e-mails on this topic than it would have taken to convert it. :-P > I have a suggestion, how about to put rheap under drivers/soc/qe, because > rheap is > To manage muram when it is added to sdk. No. -Scott