linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Neelesh Gupta <neelegup@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Enable alarms only when opal supports tpo
Date: Wed,  8 Jul 2015 14:20:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1436345407-8924-1-git-send-email-vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

rtc-opal driver provides support for rtc alarms via
times-power-on(tpo). However some platforms like BML use a fake rtc
clock and don't support tpo. Such platforms are indicated by the missing
'has-tpo' property in the device tree.

Current implementation however enables callback for
rtc_class_ops.read/set alarm irrespective of the tpo support from the
platform. This results in a failed opal call when kernel tries to read
an existing alarms via opal_get_tpo_time during rtc device registration.

This patch fixes is issue by setting opal_rtc_ops.read/set_alarm
callback pointers only when tpo is supported.

Acked-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Acked-by: Neelesh Gupta <neelegup@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
index 7061dca..1125641 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
@@ -190,11 +190,9 @@ exit:
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static const struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops = {
+static struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops = {
 	.read_time	= opal_get_rtc_time,
 	.set_time	= opal_set_rtc_time,
-	.read_alarm	= opal_get_tpo_time,
-	.set_alarm	= opal_set_tpo_time,
 };
 
 static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -202,8 +200,11 @@ static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct rtc_device *rtc;
 
 	if (pdev->dev.of_node && of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "has-tpo",
-						 NULL))
+						 NULL)) {
 		device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, true);
+		opal_rtc_ops.read_alarm	= opal_get_tpo_time;
+		opal_rtc_ops.set_alarm = opal_set_tpo_time;
+	}
 
 	rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, DRVNAME, &opal_rtc_ops,
 				       THIS_MODULE);
-- 
2.2.1

                 reply	other threads:[~2015-07-08  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1436345407-8924-1-git-send-email-vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=neelegup@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).