From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CFD01A0245 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:13:37 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <1440638016.23182.7.camel@ellerman.id.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/iommu: Cleanup setting of DMA base/offset From: Michael Ellerman To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linuxppc-dev , Gavin Shan , Wei Yang Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:13:36 +1000 In-Reply-To: <55DD7E49.6010709@ozlabs.ru> References: <1435123527.3996.30.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <55DD7E49.6010709@ozlabs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 18:52 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 06/24/2015 03:25 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Now that the table and the offset can co-exist, we no longer need > > to flip/flop, we can just establish both once at boot time. > > > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > > --- > > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 3 +-- > > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 3 +-- > > arch/powerpc/sysdev/dart_iommu.c | 16 +++------------- > > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c > > index 5738d31..2c286b57 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c > > @@ -1620,11 +1620,9 @@ static int pnv_pci_ioda_dma_set_mask(struct pci_dev *pdev, u64 dma_mask) > > if (bypass) { > > dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Using 64-bit DMA iommu bypass\n"); > > set_dma_ops(&pdev->dev, &dma_direct_ops); > > - set_dma_offset(&pdev->dev, pe->tce_bypass_base); > > > This particular change breaks SRIOV. So some SRIOV code relies on that but > I could not spot this place quickly. Thanks for finding it. > Also, this specific patch in powerpc/next tree just does not compile > because of "powerpc/iommu: Remove dma_data union" but this is another story :) cheers