From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.transmode.se (smtp.transmode.se [31.15.61.139]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7DE1A1E3A for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 00:20:46 +1000 (AEST) From: Joakim Tjernlund To: "christophe.leroy@c-s.fr" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Strange reports of perf events on powerpc 83xx Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:20:38 +0000 Message-ID: <1441203638.3349.203.camel@transmode.se> References: <55DF17A3.7070009@c-s.fr> In-Reply-To: <55DF17A3.7070009@c-s.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 15:58 +0200, leroy christophe wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Has anybody already used 'perf' tool on powerpc MPC83xx ? >=20 > I have been succesfully using perf on MPC8xx, but on MPC83xx I get=20 > something strange. >=20 > perf record/report reports addresses on user stack, as if it was mixing=20 > up D accesses and I accesses. >=20 > Any idea of what the problem can be ? We are also experiencing strange addresses on 83xx, did find the cause of this problem? We are using Linux 4.1.0 >=20 > # Samples: 8K of event 'cpu-clock' > # Event count (approx.): 2196000000 > # > # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol > # ........ ............ ..................=20 > ............................................ > # > 2.62% perf_reseau4 libpthread-2.18.so [.] __libc_send > 2.56% perf_reseau4 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __ip_make_skb > 1.62% perf_reseau4 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __ip_append_data.isra.= 39 > 1.55% perf_reseau4 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_finish_output > 1.33% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd94 > 1.33% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd95 > 1.28% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd97 > 1.26% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffda3 > 1.24% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd98 > 1.22% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd92 > 1.22% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd9b > 1.22% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffdaa > 1.21% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd96 > 1.18% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffda7 > 1.17% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd8d > 1.17% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd99 > 1.13% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd90 > 1.13% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffda2 > 1.12% perf_reseau4 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __local_bh_enable_ip > 1.12% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd9c > 1.12% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd9e > 1.10% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffda0 > 1.08% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd9f > 1.08% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffda6 > 1.05% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffda8 > 1.02% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd9a > 1.01% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffdb0 > 1.00% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd89 > 1.00% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffd8b > 1.00% perf_reseau4 [unknown] [k] 0x7ffffdac