linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	 linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [[PATCH v6 02/10] perf: Add a flags parameter to pmu txn interfaces
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 20:07:29 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441361249.3777.3.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441336073-22750-3-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 20:07 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Currently, the PMU interface allows reading only one counter at a time.
> But some PMUs like the 24x7 counters in Power, support reading several
> counters at once. To leveage this functionality, extend the transaction
> interface to support a "transaction type".
> 
> The first type, PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD, refers to the existing transactions,
> i.e. used to _schedule_ all the events on the PMU as a group. A second
> transaction type, PERF_PMU_TXN_READ, will be used in a follow-on patch,
> by the 24x7 counters to read several counters at once.
> 
> Extend the transaction interfaces to the PMU to accept a 'txn_flags'
> parameter and use this parameter to ignore any transactions that are
> not of type PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD.
> 
> Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for his input.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c  |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-

These powerpc changes look OK to me.

So for those you can have an:

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>


Having said that, we do end up repeating a lot of boiler plate for each arch,
which is a pity. eg:

> +static void power_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu, unsigned int txn_flags)
>  {
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
>
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuhw->txn_flags);		/* txn already in flight */
> +
> +	cpuhw->txn_flags = txn_flags;
> +	if (txn_flags & ~PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD)
> +		return;
> +

And so on.

But I can't think of an easy way to avoid that, so it's not a blocker, but
maybe someone can think of a nice solution to avoid it?

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-04 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-04  3:07 [PATCH v6 0/10] perf: Implement group-read of events using txn interface Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-04  3:07 ` [[PATCH v6 01/10] sparc/perf: Remove unnecessary assignment Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-04  3:07 ` [[PATCH v6 02/10] perf: Add a flags parameter to pmu txn interfaces Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-04 10:07   ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2015-09-04  3:07 ` [[PATCH v6 03/10] perf: Split perf_event_read() and perf_event_count() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-04  3:07 ` [[PATCH v6 04/10] perf: Rename perf_event_read_{one, group}, perf_read_hw Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-04  3:07 ` [[PATCH v6 05/10] perf: Add group reads to perf_event_read() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-04  3:07 ` [[PATCH v6 06/10] perf: Invert perf_read_group() loops Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-04  3:07 ` [[PATCH v6 07/10] perf: Add return value for perf_event_read() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-04  3:07 ` [[PATCH v6 08/10] Define PERF_PMU_TXN_READ interface Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-04  3:07 ` [[PATCH v6 09/10] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Use PMU_TXN_READ interface Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-08  9:07   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-08 11:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-09  2:15       ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-09 21:12         ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-09-10  0:43           ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-04  3:07 ` [[PATCH v6 10/10] perf: Drop PERF_EVENT_TXN Sukadev Bhattiprolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1441361249.3777.3.camel@ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).