From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (e23smtp09.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F2241A1F44 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:00:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:00:13 +1000 Received: from d23relay10.au.ibm.com (d23relay10.au.ibm.com [9.190.26.77]) by d23dlp02.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FE32BB005B for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:00:09 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay10.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t89500po61145218 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:00:09 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t894xZvP014326 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:59:36 +1000 Message-ID: <1441774751.2767.20.camel@au1.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 11/11] powerpc/powernv: compound PE for VFs From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Reply-To: benh@au1.ibm.com To: Richard Yang , Gavin Shan Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:59:11 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20150909033616.GA5148@richards-mbp.cn.ibm.com> References: <1437112961-17275-1-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1437112961-17275-12-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150729031718.GA18069@richard> <20150909024820.GA6808@gwshan> <20150909033616.GA5148@richards-mbp.cn.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 11:36 +0800, Richard Yang wrote: > The VF EEH is hung since we re-designed the SRIOV. After the re > -design, we > don't have VF groups. > > My plan is to push the VF EEH patch set after the SRIOV Redesign is > accepted. What do you mean taht we don't have VF groups ? If we don't have IOMMU groups per VF that means we can't assign them to KVM partitions -> they are completely useless. Ben.