From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0141.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.110.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28BFF1A041B for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:56:51 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <1442361398.2909.164.camel@freescale.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM From: Scott Wood To: Dongsheng Wang CC: , , , , , , Chenhui Zhao , Tang Yuantian Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:56:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1442307339-15225-1-git-send-email-dongsheng.wang@freescale.com> References: <1442307339-15225-1-git-send-email-dongsheng.wang@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 16:55 +0800, Dongsheng Wang wrote: > +* Freescale RCPM Wakeup Source Device Tree Bindings > +------------------------------------------- > +Required rcpm-wakeup property should be added to a device node if the > device > +can be used as a wakeup source. > + > + - rcpm-wakeup: The value of the property consists of 3 cells. The first > cell > + is a pointer to the rcpm node, the second cell is the bit mask that > + should be set in IPPDEXPCR0, and the last cell is for IPPDEXPCR1. > + Note: If the platform has no IPPDEXPCR1 register, put a zero here. What if a future platform has more than two of these registers? -Scott