From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Hongtao Jia <hongtao.jia@freescale.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 18:50:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442965805.19102.303.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442850433-5903-5-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 16:47 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> mpic_irq_set_wake return -ENXIO for non FSL MPIC and sets IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
> flag for FSL ones. enable_irq_wake already returns -ENXIO if irq_set_wak
> is not implemented. Also there's no need to set the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
> as it doesn't guarantee wakeup for that interrupt.
>
> This patch removes the redundant mpic_irq_set_wake and sets the
> IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for only FSL MPIC.
>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> Cc: Hongtao Jia <hongtao.jia@freescale.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c | 23 ++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
> index 537e5db85a06..123e43612f0a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
> @@ -924,22 +924,6 @@ int mpic_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int
> flow_type)
> return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY;
> }
>
> -static int mpic_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
> -{
> - struct irq_desc *desc = container_of(d, struct irq_desc, irq_data);
> - struct mpic *mpic = mpic_from_irq_data(d);
> -
> - if (!(mpic->flags & MPIC_FSL))
> - return -ENXIO;
> -
> - if (on)
> - desc->action->flags |= IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;
> - else
> - desc->action->flags &= ~IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> void mpic_set_vector(unsigned int virq, unsigned int vector)
> {
> struct mpic *mpic = mpic_from_irq(virq);
> @@ -977,7 +961,6 @@ static struct irq_chip mpic_irq_chip = {
> .irq_unmask = mpic_unmask_irq,
> .irq_eoi = mpic_end_irq,
> .irq_set_type = mpic_set_irq_type,
> - .irq_set_wake = mpic_irq_set_wake,
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> @@ -992,7 +975,6 @@ static struct irq_chip mpic_tm_chip = {
> .irq_mask = mpic_mask_tm,
> .irq_unmask = mpic_unmask_tm,
> .irq_eoi = mpic_end_irq,
> - .irq_set_wake = mpic_irq_set_wake,
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MPIC_U3_HT_IRQS
> @@ -1283,8 +1265,11 @@ struct mpic * __init mpic_alloc(struct device_node
> *node,
> flags |= MPIC_NO_RESET;
> if (of_get_property(node, "single-cpu-affinity", NULL))
> flags |= MPIC_SINGLE_DEST_CPU;
> - if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "fsl,mpic"))
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "fsl,mpic")) {
> flags |= MPIC_FSL | MPIC_LARGE_VECTORS;
> + mpic_irq_chip.flags |= IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE;
> + mpic_tm_chip.flags |= IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE;
> + }
What difference does IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE make in the absence of an
.irq_set_wake() callback?
This is basically repealing commit 5ff04b7287d87c1db7 ("powerpc/mpic: add
irq_set_wake support"). Wang Dongsheng, can you explain why that patch was
needed?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-22 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1442850433-5903-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2015-09-21 15:47 ` [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake Sudeep Holla
2015-09-22 23:50 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2015-09-23 2:35 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-09-23 3:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-23 5:31 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-09-23 8:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-23 4:06 ` Scott Wood
2015-10-19 17:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-10-19 17:46 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1442965805.19102.303.camel@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dongsheng.wang@freescale.com \
--cc=hongtao.jia@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).