From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0116.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B85C21A0329 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 05:30:22 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <1443123009.32298.29.camel@freescale.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM From: Scott Wood To: Dongsheng Wang CC: , , , , , , , Chenhui Zhao , Tang Yuantian Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:30:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1443083354-37369-1-git-send-email-dongsheng.wang@freescale.com> References: <1443083354-37369-1-git-send-email-dongsheng.wang@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 16:29 +0800, Dongsheng Wang wrote: > +* Freescale RCPM Wakeup Source Device Tree Bindings > +------------------------------------------- > +Required rcpm-wakeup property should be added to a device node if the > device > +can be used as a wakeup source. > + > + - rcpm-wakeup: The value of the property consists of cells, the number of > + cells defined in "fsl,#rcpm-wakeup-cells". The first cell is a pointer > + to the rcpm node, the second cell is the bit mask that should be set > + in IPPDEXPCR0, and the third cell is for IPPDEXPCR1, and so on. The phandle should not be included in the cell count. -Scott