From: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 21:24:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1443839086.13186.219.camel@otta> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151002220051.GA26712@gate.crashing.org>
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 17:00 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 12:37:35AM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> > >> -0: tlbie r4; \
> > >> +0: tlbie r4, 0; \
> > >
> > > This isn't correct. With POWER7 and later (which this compile
> > > is, since it's on LE), the tlbie instruction takes two register
> > > operands:
> > >
> > > tlbie RB, RS
> > >
> > > The tlbie instruction on pre POWER7 cpus had one required register
> > > operand (RB) and an optional second L operand, where if you omitted
> > > it, it was the same as using "0":
> > >
> > > tlbie RB, L
> > >
> > > This is a POWER7 and later build, so your change which adds the "0"
> > > above is really adding r0 for RS. The new tlbie instruction doesn't
> > > treat r0 specially, so you'll be using whatever random bits which
> > > happen to be in r0 which I don't think that is what you want.
> >
> > Ok, than we can just zero out r5 for example and use it in tlbie as RS,
> > right?
>
> That won't assemble _unless_ your assembler is in POWER7 mode. It also
> won't do the right thing at run time on older machines.
Correct, getting this to work on both pre-power7 and power7 and later
is tricky. One really horrible hack would be to do:
li r0,0
tlbie r4,0
On pre-power7, the "0" will be taken as a zero L operand and on
power7 and later, it'll be r0, but with a zero value we loaded in
the insn before. I know, really ugly. :-)
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-03 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-02 15:43 Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 Laura Abbott
2015-10-02 19:03 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-10-02 20:15 ` Peter Bergner
2015-10-02 21:37 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-10-02 22:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2015-10-02 22:12 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-03 2:24 ` Peter Bergner [this message]
2015-10-04 0:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2015-10-06 0:39 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 3:35 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-06 18:25 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-07 6:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-07 7:19 ` Segher Boessenkool
2015-10-07 9:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-07 14:31 ` Josh Boyer
2015-10-08 0:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-08 0:15 ` Josh Boyer
2015-10-08 0:38 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1443839086.13186.219.camel@otta \
--to=bergner@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kda@linux-powerpc.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).