* [PATCH V7 1/6] powerpc/powernv: don't enable SRIOV when VF BAR has non 64bit-prefetchable BAR
2015-10-22 1:22 [PATCH V7 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV Wei Yang
@ 2015-10-22 1:22 ` Wei Yang
2016-02-17 12:41 ` [V7, " Michael Ellerman
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 2/6] powerpc/powernv: simplify the calculation of iov resource alignment Wei Yang
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2015-10-22 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gwshan, aik, benh; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, mpe, Wei Yang
On PHB3, we enable SRIOV devices by mapping IOV BAR with M64 BARs. If a
SRIOV device's IOV BAR is not 64bit-prefetchable, this is not assigned from
64bit prefetchable window, which means M64 BAR can't work on it.
The reason is PCI bridges support only 2 memory windows and the kernel code
programs bridges in the way that one window is 32bit-nonprefetchable and
the other one is 64bit-prefetchable. So if devices' IOV BAR is 64bit and
non-prefetchable, it will be mapped into 32bit space and therefore M64
cannot be used for it.
This patch makes this explicit and truncate IOV resource in this case to
save MMIO space.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index 85cbc96..02324c6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
@@ -908,9 +908,6 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
if (!res->flags || !res->parent)
continue;
- if (!pnv_pci_is_mem_pref_64(res->flags))
- continue;
-
/*
* The actual IOV BAR range is determined by the start address
* and the actual size for num_vfs VFs BAR. This check is to
@@ -939,9 +936,6 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
if (!res->flags || !res->parent)
continue;
- if (!pnv_pci_is_mem_pref_64(res->flags))
- continue;
-
size = pci_iov_resource_size(dev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
res2 = *res;
res->start += size * offset;
@@ -1221,9 +1215,6 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
if (!res->flags || !res->parent)
continue;
- if (!pnv_pci_is_mem_pref_64(res->flags))
- continue;
-
for (j = 0; j < vf_groups; j++) {
do {
win = find_next_zero_bit(&phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc,
@@ -1510,6 +1501,12 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA2) {
+ if (!pdn->vfs_expanded) {
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "don't support this SRIOV device"
+ " with non 64bit-prefetchable IOV BAR\n");
+ return -ENOSPC;
+ }
+
/* Calculate available PE for required VFs */
mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
pdn->offset = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(
@@ -2775,9 +2772,10 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
if (!res->flags || res->parent)
continue;
if (!pnv_pci_is_mem_pref_64(res->flags)) {
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, " non M64 VF BAR%d: %pR\n",
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Don't support SR-IOV with"
+ " non M64 VF BAR%d: %pR. \n",
i, res);
- continue;
+ goto truncate_iov;
}
size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
@@ -2796,11 +2794,6 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
if (!res->flags || res->parent)
continue;
- if (!pnv_pci_is_mem_pref_64(res->flags)) {
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Skipping expanding VF BAR%d: %pR\n",
- i, res);
- continue;
- }
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, " Fixing VF BAR%d: %pR to\n", i, res);
size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
@@ -2810,6 +2803,16 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
i, res, mul);
}
pdn->vfs_expanded = mul;
+
+ return;
+
+truncate_iov:
+ /* To save MMIO space, IOV BAR is truncated. */
+ for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
+ res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
+ res->flags = 0;
+ res->end = res->start - 1;
+ }
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [V7, 1/6] powerpc/powernv: don't enable SRIOV when VF BAR has non 64bit-prefetchable BAR
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 1/6] powerpc/powernv: don't enable SRIOV when VF BAR has non 64bit-prefetchable BAR Wei Yang
@ 2016-02-17 12:41 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2016-02-17 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang, gwshan, aik, benh; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Wei Yang
On Thu, 2015-22-10 at 01:22:14 UTC, Wei Yang wrote:
> On PHB3, we enable SRIOV devices by mapping IOV BAR with M64 BARs. If a
> SRIOV device's IOV BAR is not 64bit-prefetchable, this is not assigned from
> 64bit prefetchable window, which means M64 BAR can't work on it.
>
> The reason is PCI bridges support only 2 memory windows and the kernel code
> programs bridges in the way that one window is 32bit-nonprefetchable and
> the other one is 64bit-prefetchable. So if devices' IOV BAR is 64bit and
> non-prefetchable, it will be mapped into 32bit space and therefore M64
> cannot be used for it.
>
> This patch makes this explicit and truncate IOV resource in this case to
> save MMIO space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Series applied to powerpc next, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/b0331854190e70b9d96d392572
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V7 2/6] powerpc/powernv: simplify the calculation of iov resource alignment
2015-10-22 1:22 [PATCH V7 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV Wei Yang
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 1/6] powerpc/powernv: don't enable SRIOV when VF BAR has non 64bit-prefetchable BAR Wei Yang
@ 2015-10-22 1:22 ` Wei Yang
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 3/6] powerpc/powernv: use one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for one VF BAR Wei Yang
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2015-10-22 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gwshan, aik, benh; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, mpe, Wei Yang
The alignment of IOV BAR on PowerNV platform is the total size of the IOV
BAR. No matter whether the IOV BAR is extended with number of
roundup_pow_of_two(total_vfs) or number of max PE number (256), the total
size could be calculated by (vfs_expanded * VF_BAR_size).
This patch simplifies the pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment() by removing the
first case.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index 02324c6..dc0c90b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
@@ -2998,17 +2998,21 @@ static resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev,
int resno)
{
struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
- resource_size_t align, iov_align;
-
- iov_align = resource_size(&pdev->resource[resno]);
- if (iov_align)
- return iov_align;
+ resource_size_t align;
+ /*
+ * On PowerNV platform, IOV BAR is mapped by M64 BAR to enable the
+ * SR-IOV. While from hardware perspective, the range mapped by M64
+ * BAR should be size aligned.
+ *
+ * This function returns the total IOV BAR size if M64 BAR is in
+ * Shared PE mode or just VF BAR size if not.
+ */
align = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, resno);
- if (pdn->vfs_expanded)
- return pdn->vfs_expanded * align;
+ if (!pdn->vfs_expanded)
+ return align;
- return align;
+ return pdn->vfs_expanded * align;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH V7 3/6] powerpc/powernv: use one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for one VF BAR
2015-10-22 1:22 [PATCH V7 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV Wei Yang
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 1/6] powerpc/powernv: don't enable SRIOV when VF BAR has non 64bit-prefetchable BAR Wei Yang
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 2/6] powerpc/powernv: simplify the calculation of iov resource alignment Wei Yang
@ 2015-10-22 1:22 ` Wei Yang
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 4/6] powerpc/powernv: replace the hard coded boundary with gate Wei Yang
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2015-10-22 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gwshan, aik, benh; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, mpe, Wei Yang
In current implementation, when VF BAR is bigger than 64MB, it uses 4 M64
BARs in Single PE mode to cover the number of VFs required to be enabled.
By doing so, several VFs would be in one VF Group and leads to interference
between VFs in the same group.
And in this patch, m64_wins is renamed to m64_map, which means index number
of the M64 BAR used to map the VF BAR. Based on Gavin's comments. Also
makes sure the VF BAR size is bigger than 32MB when M64 BAR is used in
Single PE mode.
This patch changes the design by using one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for
one VF BAR. This gives absolute isolation for VFs.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 5 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 177 ++++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
index 712add5..8aeba4c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
@@ -214,10 +214,9 @@ struct pci_dn {
u16 vfs_expanded; /* number of VFs IOV BAR expanded */
u16 num_vfs; /* number of VFs enabled*/
int offset; /* PE# for the first VF PE */
-#define M64_PER_IOV 4
- int m64_per_iov;
+ bool m64_single_mode; /* Use M64 BAR in Single Mode */
#define IODA_INVALID_M64 (-1)
- int m64_wins[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS][M64_PER_IOV];
+ int (*m64_map)[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS];
#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
#endif
struct list_head child_list;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index dc0c90b..f867a9b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
@@ -1148,29 +1148,36 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_PEs(void)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
-static int pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+static int pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
{
struct pci_bus *bus;
struct pci_controller *hose;
struct pnv_phb *phb;
struct pci_dn *pdn;
int i, j;
+ int m64_bars;
bus = pdev->bus;
hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
phb = hose->private_data;
pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
+ m64_bars = num_vfs;
+ else
+ m64_bars = 1;
+
for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++)
- for (j = 0; j < M64_PER_IOV; j++) {
- if (pdn->m64_wins[i][j] == IODA_INVALID_M64)
+ for (j = 0; j < m64_bars; j++) {
+ if (pdn->m64_map[j][i] == IODA_INVALID_M64)
continue;
opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
- OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 0);
- clear_bit(pdn->m64_wins[i][j], &phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc);
- pdn->m64_wins[i][j] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_map[j][i], 0);
+ clear_bit(pdn->m64_map[j][i], &phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc);
+ pdn->m64_map[j][i] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
}
+ kfree(pdn->m64_map);
return 0;
}
@@ -1187,8 +1194,7 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
int total_vfs;
resource_size_t size, start;
int pe_num;
- int vf_groups;
- int vf_per_group;
+ int m64_bars;
bus = pdev->bus;
hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
@@ -1196,26 +1202,26 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
- /* Initialize the m64_wins to IODA_INVALID_M64 */
- for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++)
- for (j = 0; j < M64_PER_IOV; j++)
- pdn->m64_wins[i][j] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
+ m64_bars = num_vfs;
+ else
+ m64_bars = 1;
+
+ pdn->m64_map = kmalloc(sizeof(*pdn->m64_map) * m64_bars, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pdn->m64_map)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ /* Initialize the m64_map to IODA_INVALID_M64 */
+ for (i = 0; i < m64_bars ; i++)
+ for (j = 0; j < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; j++)
+ pdn->m64_map[i][j] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV) {
- vf_groups = (num_vfs <= M64_PER_IOV) ? num_vfs: M64_PER_IOV;
- vf_per_group = (num_vfs <= M64_PER_IOV)? 1:
- roundup_pow_of_two(num_vfs) / pdn->m64_per_iov;
- } else {
- vf_groups = 1;
- vf_per_group = 1;
- }
for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
if (!res->flags || !res->parent)
continue;
- for (j = 0; j < vf_groups; j++) {
+ for (j = 0; j < m64_bars; j++) {
do {
win = find_next_zero_bit(&phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc,
phb->ioda.m64_bar_idx + 1, 0);
@@ -1224,12 +1230,11 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
goto m64_failed;
} while (test_and_set_bit(win, &phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc));
- pdn->m64_wins[i][j] = win;
+ pdn->m64_map[j][i] = win;
- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV) {
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev,
PCI_IOV_RESOURCES + i);
- size = size * vf_per_group;
start = res->start + size * j;
} else {
size = resource_size(res);
@@ -1237,16 +1242,16 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
}
/* Map the M64 here */
- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV) {
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
pe_num = pdn->offset + j;
rc = opal_pci_map_pe_mmio_window(phb->opal_id,
pe_num, OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
- pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 0);
+ pdn->m64_map[j][i], 0);
}
rc = opal_pci_set_phb_mem_window(phb->opal_id,
OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
- pdn->m64_wins[i][j],
+ pdn->m64_map[j][i],
start,
0, /* unused */
size);
@@ -1258,12 +1263,12 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
goto m64_failed;
}
- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV)
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
rc = opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
- OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 2);
+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_map[j][i], 2);
else
rc = opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
- OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 1);
+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_map[j][i], 1);
if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable M64 window #%d: %llx\n",
@@ -1275,7 +1280,7 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
return 0;
m64_failed:
- pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev);
+ pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
return -EBUSY;
}
@@ -1302,15 +1307,13 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda2_release_dma_pe(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pnv_ioda_pe
iommu_free_table(tbl, of_node_full_name(dev->dev.of_node));
}
-static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
+static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct pci_bus *bus;
struct pci_controller *hose;
struct pnv_phb *phb;
struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, *pe_n;
struct pci_dn *pdn;
- u16 vf_index;
- int64_t rc;
bus = pdev->bus;
hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
@@ -1320,35 +1323,6 @@ static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
if (!pdev->is_physfn)
return;
- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV && num_vfs > M64_PER_IOV) {
- int vf_group;
- int vf_per_group;
- int vf_index1;
-
- vf_per_group = roundup_pow_of_two(num_vfs) / pdn->m64_per_iov;
-
- for (vf_group = 0; vf_group < M64_PER_IOV; vf_group++)
- for (vf_index = vf_group * vf_per_group;
- vf_index < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
- vf_index < num_vfs;
- vf_index++)
- for (vf_index1 = vf_group * vf_per_group;
- vf_index1 < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
- vf_index1 < num_vfs;
- vf_index1++){
-
- rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id,
- pdn->offset + vf_index,
- pdn->offset + vf_index1,
- OPAL_REMOVE_PE_FROM_DOMAIN);
-
- if (rc)
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Failed to unlink same group PE#%d(%lld)\n",
- __func__,
- pdn->offset + vf_index1, rc);
- }
- }
-
list_for_each_entry_safe(pe, pe_n, &phb->ioda.pe_list, list) {
if (pe->parent_dev != pdev)
continue;
@@ -1383,14 +1357,14 @@ void pnv_pci_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
num_vfs = pdn->num_vfs;
/* Release VF PEs */
- pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(pdev, num_vfs);
+ pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(pdev);
if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA2) {
- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == 1)
+ if (!pdn->m64_single_mode)
pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, -pdn->offset);
/* Release M64 windows */
- pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev);
+ pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
/* Release PE numbers */
bitmap_clear(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, pdn->offset, num_vfs);
@@ -1409,7 +1383,6 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
int pe_num;
u16 vf_index;
struct pci_dn *pdn;
- int64_t rc;
bus = pdev->bus;
hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
@@ -1454,37 +1427,6 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe);
}
-
- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV && num_vfs > M64_PER_IOV) {
- int vf_group;
- int vf_per_group;
- int vf_index1;
-
- vf_per_group = roundup_pow_of_two(num_vfs) / pdn->m64_per_iov;
-
- for (vf_group = 0; vf_group < M64_PER_IOV; vf_group++) {
- for (vf_index = vf_group * vf_per_group;
- vf_index < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
- vf_index < num_vfs;
- vf_index++) {
- for (vf_index1 = vf_group * vf_per_group;
- vf_index1 < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
- vf_index1 < num_vfs;
- vf_index1++) {
-
- rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id,
- pdn->offset + vf_index,
- pdn->offset + vf_index1,
- OPAL_ADD_PE_TO_DOMAIN);
-
- if (rc)
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Failed to link same group PE#%d(%lld)\n",
- __func__,
- pdn->offset + vf_index1, rc);
- }
- }
- }
- }
}
int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
@@ -1507,6 +1449,15 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
return -ENOSPC;
}
+ /*
+ * When M64 BARs functions in Single PE mode, the number of VFs
+ * could be enabled must be less than the number of M64 BARs.
+ */
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode && num_vfs > phb->ioda.m64_bar_idx) {
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Not enough M64 BAR for VFs\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
/* Calculate available PE for required VFs */
mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
pdn->offset = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(
@@ -1534,7 +1485,7 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
* the IOV BAR according to the PE# allocated to the VFs.
* Otherwise, the PE# for the VF will conflict with others.
*/
- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == 1) {
+ if (!pdn->m64_single_mode) {
ret = pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, pdn->offset);
if (ret)
goto m64_failed;
@@ -1567,8 +1518,7 @@ int pcibios_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
/* Allocate PCI data */
add_dev_pci_data(pdev);
- pnv_pci_sriov_enable(pdev, num_vfs);
- return 0;
+ return pnv_pci_sriov_enable(pdev, num_vfs);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
@@ -2762,9 +2712,9 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
pdn->vfs_expanded = 0;
+ pdn->m64_single_mode = false;
total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
- pdn->m64_per_iov = 1;
mul = phb->ioda.total_pe;
for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
@@ -2784,8 +2734,8 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
if (size > (1 << 26)) {
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PowerNV: VF BAR%d: %pR IOV size is bigger than 64M, roundup power2\n",
i, res);
- pdn->m64_per_iov = M64_PER_IOV;
mul = roundup_pow_of_two(total_vfs);
+ pdn->m64_single_mode = true;
break;
}
}
@@ -2795,8 +2745,14 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
if (!res->flags || res->parent)
continue;
- dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, " Fixing VF BAR%d: %pR to\n", i, res);
size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
+ /*
+ * On PHB3, the minimum size alignment of M64 BAR in single
+ * mode is 32MB.
+ */
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode && (size < SZ_32M))
+ goto truncate_iov;
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, " Fixing VF BAR%d: %pR to\n", i, res);
res->end = res->start + size * mul - 1;
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, " %pR\n", res);
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "VF BAR%d: %pR (expanded to %d VFs for PE alignment)",
@@ -2997,6 +2953,8 @@ static resource_size_t pnv_pci_window_alignment(struct pci_bus *bus,
static resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev,
int resno)
{
+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
+ struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
resource_size_t align;
@@ -3005,12 +2963,23 @@ static resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev,
* SR-IOV. While from hardware perspective, the range mapped by M64
* BAR should be size aligned.
*
+ * When IOV BAR is mapped with M64 BAR in Single PE mode, the extra
+ * powernv-specific hardware restriction is gone. But if just use the
+ * VF BAR size as the alignment, PF BAR / VF BAR may be allocated with
+ * in one segment of M64 #15, which introduces the PE conflict between
+ * PF and VF. Based on this, the minimum alignment of an IOV BAR is
+ * m64_segsize.
+ *
* This function returns the total IOV BAR size if M64 BAR is in
* Shared PE mode or just VF BAR size if not.
+ * If the M64 BAR is in Single PE mode, return the VF BAR size or
+ * M64 segment size if IOV BAR size is less.
*/
align = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, resno);
if (!pdn->vfs_expanded)
return align;
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
+ return max(align, (resource_size_t)phb->ioda.m64_segsize);
return pdn->vfs_expanded * align;
}
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH V7 4/6] powerpc/powernv: replace the hard coded boundary with gate
2015-10-22 1:22 [PATCH V7 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV Wei Yang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 3/6] powerpc/powernv: use one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for one VF BAR Wei Yang
@ 2015-10-22 1:22 ` Wei Yang
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 5/6] powerpc/powernv: boundary the total VF BAR size instead of the individual one Wei Yang
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2015-10-22 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gwshan, aik, benh; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, mpe, Wei Yang
At the moment 64bit-prefetchable window can be maximum 64GB, which is
currently got from device tree. This means that in shared mode the maximum
supported VF BAR size is 64GB/256=256MB. While this size could exhaust the
whole 64bit-prefetchable window. This is a design decision to set a
boundary to 64MB of the VF BAR size. Since VF BAR size with 64MB would
occupy a quarter of the 64bit-prefetchable window, this is affordable.
This patch replaces magic limit of 64MB with "gate", which is 1/4 of the
M64 Segment Size(m64_segsize >> 2) and adds comment to explain the reason
for it.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vent.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index f867a9b..0add35f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
@@ -2696,8 +2696,9 @@ static void pnv_pci_init_ioda_msis(struct pnv_phb *phb) { }
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
- struct pci_controller *hose;
- struct pnv_phb *phb;
+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
+ struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
+ const resource_size_t gate = phb->ioda.m64_segsize >> 2;
struct resource *res;
int i;
resource_size_t size;
@@ -2707,9 +2708,6 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
if (!pdev->is_physfn || pdev->is_added)
return;
- hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
- phb = hose->private_data;
-
pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
pdn->vfs_expanded = 0;
pdn->m64_single_mode = false;
@@ -2730,10 +2728,22 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
- /* bigger than 64M */
- if (size > (1 << 26)) {
- dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PowerNV: VF BAR%d: %pR IOV size is bigger than 64M, roundup power2\n",
- i, res);
+ /*
+ * If bigger than quarter of M64 segment size, just round up
+ * power of two.
+ *
+ * Generally, one M64 BAR maps one IOV BAR. To avoid conflict
+ * with other devices, IOV BAR size is expanded to be
+ * (total_pe * VF_BAR_size). When VF_BAR_size is half of M64
+ * segment size , the expanded size would equal to half of the
+ * whole M64 space size, which will exhaust the M64 Space and
+ * limit the system flexibility. This is a design decision to
+ * set the boundary to quarter of the M64 segment size.
+ */
+ if (size > gate) {
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PowerNV: VF BAR%d: %pR IOV size "
+ "is bigger than %lld, roundup power2\n",
+ i, res, gate);
mul = roundup_pow_of_two(total_vfs);
pdn->m64_single_mode = true;
break;
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH V7 5/6] powerpc/powernv: boundary the total VF BAR size instead of the individual one
2015-10-22 1:22 [PATCH V7 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV Wei Yang
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 4/6] powerpc/powernv: replace the hard coded boundary with gate Wei Yang
@ 2015-10-22 1:22 ` Wei Yang
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 6/6] powerpc/powernv: allocate sparse PE# when using M64 BAR in Single PE mode Wei Yang
2015-10-22 11:13 ` [PATCH V7 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV Gavin Shan
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2015-10-22 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gwshan, aik, benh; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, mpe, Wei Yang
Each VF could have 6 BARs at most. When the total BAR size exceeds the
gate, after expanding it will also exhaust the M64 Window.
This patch limits the boundary by checking the total VF BAR size instead of
the individual BAR.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index 0add35f..1c11b1a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
@@ -2701,7 +2701,7 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
const resource_size_t gate = phb->ioda.m64_segsize >> 2;
struct resource *res;
int i;
- resource_size_t size;
+ resource_size_t size, total_vf_bar_sz;
struct pci_dn *pdn;
int mul, total_vfs;
@@ -2714,6 +2714,7 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
mul = phb->ioda.total_pe;
+ total_vf_bar_sz = 0;
for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
@@ -2726,7 +2727,8 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
goto truncate_iov;
}
- size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
+ total_vf_bar_sz += pci_iov_resource_size(pdev,
+ i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
/*
* If bigger than quarter of M64 segment size, just round up
@@ -2740,11 +2742,11 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
* limit the system flexibility. This is a design decision to
* set the boundary to quarter of the M64 segment size.
*/
- if (size > gate) {
- dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PowerNV: VF BAR%d: %pR IOV size "
- "is bigger than %lld, roundup power2\n",
- i, res, gate);
+ if (total_vf_bar_sz > gate) {
mul = roundup_pow_of_two(total_vfs);
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev,
+ "VF BAR Total IOV size %llx > %llx, roundup to %d VFs\n",
+ total_vf_bar_sz, gate, mul);
pdn->m64_single_mode = true;
break;
}
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH V7 6/6] powerpc/powernv: allocate sparse PE# when using M64 BAR in Single PE mode
2015-10-22 1:22 [PATCH V7 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV Wei Yang
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 5/6] powerpc/powernv: boundary the total VF BAR size instead of the individual one Wei Yang
@ 2015-10-22 1:22 ` Wei Yang
2015-10-22 11:13 ` [PATCH V7 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV Gavin Shan
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2015-10-22 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gwshan, aik, benh; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, mpe, Wei Yang
When M64 BAR is set to Single PE mode, the PE# assigned to VF could be
sparse.
This patch restructures the code to allocate sparse PE# for VFs when M64
BAR is set to Single PE mode. Also it rename the offset to pe_num_map to
reflect the content is the PE number.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
index 8aeba4c..b3a226b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ struct pci_dn {
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
u16 vfs_expanded; /* number of VFs IOV BAR expanded */
u16 num_vfs; /* number of VFs enabled*/
- int offset; /* PE# for the first VF PE */
+ int *pe_num_map; /* PE# for the first VF PE or array */
bool m64_single_mode; /* Use M64 BAR in Single Mode */
#define IODA_INVALID_M64 (-1)
int (*m64_map)[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS];
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index 1c11b1a..91be853 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
/* Map the M64 here */
if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
- pe_num = pdn->offset + j;
+ pe_num = pdn->pe_num_map[j];
rc = opal_pci_map_pe_mmio_window(phb->opal_id,
pe_num, OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
pdn->m64_map[j][i], 0);
@@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ void pnv_pci_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
struct pnv_phb *phb;
struct pci_dn *pdn;
struct pci_sriov *iov;
- u16 num_vfs;
+ u16 num_vfs, i;
bus = pdev->bus;
hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
@@ -1361,14 +1361,21 @@ void pnv_pci_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA2) {
if (!pdn->m64_single_mode)
- pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, -pdn->offset);
+ pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, -*pdn->pe_num_map);
/* Release M64 windows */
pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
/* Release PE numbers */
- bitmap_clear(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, pdn->offset, num_vfs);
- pdn->offset = 0;
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
+ for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) {
+ if (pdn->pe_num_map[i] != IODA_INVALID_PE)
+ pnv_ioda_free_pe(phb, pdn->pe_num_map[i]);
+ }
+ } else
+ bitmap_clear(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, *pdn->pe_num_map, num_vfs);
+ /* Releasing pe_num_map */
+ kfree(pdn->pe_num_map);
}
}
@@ -1394,7 +1401,10 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
/* Reserve PE for each VF */
for (vf_index = 0; vf_index < num_vfs; vf_index++) {
- pe_num = pdn->offset + vf_index;
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
+ pe_num = pdn->pe_num_map[vf_index];
+ else
+ pe_num = *pdn->pe_num_map + vf_index;
pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pe_num];
pe->pe_number = pe_num;
@@ -1436,6 +1446,7 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
struct pnv_phb *phb;
struct pci_dn *pdn;
int ret;
+ u16 i;
bus = pdev->bus;
hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
@@ -1458,20 +1469,44 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
return -EBUSY;
}
+ /* Allocating pe_num_map */
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
+ pdn->pe_num_map = kmalloc(sizeof(*pdn->pe_num_map) * num_vfs,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ else
+ pdn->pe_num_map = kmalloc(sizeof(*pdn->pe_num_map), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ if (!pdn->pe_num_map)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
+ for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++)
+ pdn->pe_num_map[i] = IODA_INVALID_PE;
+
/* Calculate available PE for required VFs */
- mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
- pdn->offset = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(
- phb->ioda.pe_alloc, phb->ioda.total_pe,
- 0, num_vfs, 0);
- if (pdn->offset >= phb->ioda.total_pe) {
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
+ for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) {
+ pdn->pe_num_map[i] = pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(phb);
+ if (pdn->pe_num_map[i] == IODA_INVALID_PE) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto m64_failed;
+ }
+ }
+ } else {
+ mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
+ *pdn->pe_num_map = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(
+ phb->ioda.pe_alloc, phb->ioda.total_pe,
+ 0, num_vfs, 0);
+ if (*pdn->pe_num_map >= phb->ioda.total_pe) {
+ mutex_unlock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable VF%d\n", num_vfs);
+ kfree(pdn->pe_num_map);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+ bitmap_set(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, *pdn->pe_num_map, num_vfs);
mutex_unlock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
- dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable VF%d\n", num_vfs);
- pdn->offset = 0;
- return -EBUSY;
}
- bitmap_set(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, pdn->offset, num_vfs);
pdn->num_vfs = num_vfs;
- mutex_unlock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
/* Assign M64 window accordingly */
ret = pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
@@ -1486,7 +1521,7 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
* Otherwise, the PE# for the VF will conflict with others.
*/
if (!pdn->m64_single_mode) {
- ret = pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, pdn->offset);
+ ret = pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, *pdn->pe_num_map);
if (ret)
goto m64_failed;
}
@@ -1498,8 +1533,16 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
return 0;
m64_failed:
- bitmap_clear(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, pdn->offset, num_vfs);
- pdn->offset = 0;
+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
+ for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) {
+ if (pdn->pe_num_map[i] != IODA_INVALID_PE)
+ pnv_ioda_free_pe(phb, pdn->pe_num_map[i]);
+ }
+ } else
+ bitmap_clear(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, *pdn->pe_num_map, num_vfs);
+
+ /* Releasing pe_num_map */
+ kfree(pdn->pe_num_map);
return ret;
}
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V7 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV
2015-10-22 1:22 [PATCH V7 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV Wei Yang
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-10-22 1:22 ` [PATCH V7 6/6] powerpc/powernv: allocate sparse PE# when using M64 BAR in Single PE mode Wei Yang
@ 2015-10-22 11:13 ` Gavin Shan
6 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Shan @ 2015-10-22 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang; +Cc: gwshan, aik, benh, linuxppc-dev, mpe
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 09:22:13AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>In original design, it tries to group VFs to enable more number of VFs in the
>system, when VF BAR is bigger than 64MB. This design has a flaw in which one
>error on a VF will interfere other VFs in the same group.
>
>This patch series change this design by using M64 BAR in Single PE mode to
>cover only one VF BAR. By doing so, it gives absolute isolation between VFs.
>
This series looks good to me, no obvious problems found. By the way, The
VF EEH patchset has been there for some time, could you respin it on top
of this series and resend that after retesting?
In case Michael need the ack as mentioned last time in IRC:
Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>v7:
> * clear res->flags when truncating the IOV BAR
>v6:
> * add the minimum size check when M64 BAR is in Single PE mode
> * truncate IOV BAR when powernv can't handle it
>v5:
> * rebase on top of v4.2, with commit 68230242cdb "net/mlx4_core: Add port
> attribute when tracking counters" reverted
> * add some reason in change log of Patch 1
> * make the pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment() more easy to read
> * initialize pe_num_map[] just after it is allocated
> * test ssh from guest to host via VF passed and then shutdown the guest
> * no code change
>v4:
> * rebase the code on top of v4.2-rc7
> * switch back to use the dynamic version of pe_num_map and m64_map
> * split the memory allocation and PE assignment of pe_num_map to make it
> more easy to read
> * check pe_num_map value before free PE.
> * add the rename reason for pe_num_map and m64_map in change log
>v3:
> * return -ENOSPC when a VF has non-64bit prefetchable BAR
> * rename offset to pe_num_map and define it staticly
> * change commit log based on comments
> * define m64_map staticly
>v2:
> * clean up iov bar alignment calculation
> * change m64s to m64_bars
> * add a field to represent M64 Single PE mode will be used
> * change m64_wins to m64_map
> * calculate the gate instead of hard coded
> * dynamically allocate m64_map
> * dynamically allocate PE#
> * add a case to calculate iov bar alignment when M64 Single PE is used
> * when M64 Single PE is used, compare num_vfs with M64 BAR available number
> in system at first
>
>
>Wei Yang (6):
> powerpc/powernv: don't enable SRIOV when VF BAR has non
> 64bit-prefetchable BAR
> powerpc/powernv: simplify the calculation of iov resource alignment
> powerpc/powernv: use one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for one VF BAR
> powerpc/powernv: replace the hard coded boundary with gate
> powerpc/powernv: boundary the total VF BAR size instead of the
> individual one
> powerpc/powernv: allocate sparse PE# when using M64 BAR in Single PE
> mode
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 7 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 347 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-)
>
>--
>2.5.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread