linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"frowand.list@gmail.com" <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	"mitchelh@codeaurora.org" <mitchelh@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Print rather than WARN'ing when overlap check fails
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 08:47:03 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447192023.25407.0.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CBCEE2E@AcuExch.aculab.com>

On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 09:41 +0000, David Laight wrote:

> From: Michael Ellerman

> > Sent: 10 November 2015 05:09
> > __rmem_check_for_overlap() is called very early in boot, and on some
> > powerpc systems it's not safe to call WARN that early in boot.
> > 
> > If the overlap check fails the system will oops instead of printing a
> > warning. Furthermore because it's so early in boot the console is not up
> > and the user doesn't see the oops, they just get a dead system.
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to add the required checks to WARN()?

Yes obviously it would. But that's less simple than it sounds. I'm working on
it.

cheers

      reply	other threads:[~2015-11-10 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-10  5:08 [PATCH] of: Print rather than WARN'ing when overlap check fails Michael Ellerman
2015-11-10  9:28 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-11-10  9:41 ` David Laight
2015-11-10 21:47   ` Michael Ellerman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1447192023.25407.0.camel@ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mitchelh@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).