From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, corbet@lwn.net, aik@ozlabs.ru,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com, zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: Add support for enforcing all MMIO BARs to be page aligned
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:47:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1451940460.6585.6.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451551844-11732-2-git-send-email-xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 16:50 +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> When vfio passthrough a PCI device of which MMIO BARs
> are smaller than PAGE_SIZE, guest will not handle the
> mmio accesses to the BARs which leads to mmio emulations
> in host.
>
> This is because vfio will not allow to passthrough one
> BAR's mmio page which may be shared with other BARs.
>
> To solve this performance issue, this patch adds a kernel
> parameter "pci=resource_page_aligned=on" to enforce
> the alignments of all MMIO BARs to be at least PAGE_SIZE,
> so that one BAR's mmio page would not be shared with other
> BARs. We can also disable it through kernel parameter
> "pci=resource_page_aligned=off".
Shouldn't this somehow be associated with the realloc option? I don't
think PCI code will attempt to reprogram anything unless it needs to
otherwise.
> For the default value of this parameter, we think it should be
> arch-independent, so we add a macro PCI_RESOURCE_PAGE_ALIGNED
> to change it. And we define this macro to enable this parameter
> by default on PPC64 platform which can easily hit this
> performance issue because its PAGE_SIZE is 64KB.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 4 ++++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 7 ++++++-
> include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++
> 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 742f69d..a53aaee 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -2857,6 +2857,10 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
> PAGE_SIZE is used as alignment.
> PCI-PCI bridge can be specified, if resource
> windows need to be expanded.
> + resource_page_aligned= Enable/disable enforcing the alignment
> + of all PCI devices' memory resources to be
> + at least PAGE_SIZE.
> + Format: { "on" | "off" }
> ecrc= Enable/disable PCIe ECRC (transaction layer
> end-to-end CRC checking).
> bios: Use BIOS/firmware settings. This is the
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h
> index 3453bd8..27bff59 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -136,6 +136,17 @@ extern pgprot_t pci_phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file,
> unsigned long pfn,
> unsigned long size,
> pgprot_t prot);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> +
> +/* For PPC64, We enforce all PCI MMIO BARs to be page aligned
> + * by default. This would be helpful to improve performance
> + * when we passthrough a PCI device of which BARs are smaller
> + * than PAGE_SIZE(64KB). And we can use bootcmd
> + * "pci=resource_page_aligned=off" to disable it.
> + */
> +#define PCI_ENABLE_RESOURCE_PAGE_ALIGNED
> +
> +#endif
This should be done with something like HAVE_PCI_DEFAULT_RESOURCE_PAGE_
ALIGNED in arch/powerpc/include/asm
> #define HAVE_ARCH_PCI_RESOURCE_TO_USER
> extern void pci_resource_to_user(const struct pci_dev *dev, int bar,
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 314db8c..9f14ba5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,13 @@ u8 pci_cache_line_size;
> */
> unsigned int pcibios_max_latency = 255;
>
> +#ifdef PCI_ENABLE_RESOURCE_PAGE_ALIGNED
> +bool pci_resource_page_aligned = true;
> +#else
> +bool pci_resource_page_aligned;
> +#endif
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_resource_page_aligned);
Couldn't this be done in a single line with IS_ENABLED() macro?
Should this symbol be GPL-only?
> +
> /* If set, the PCIe ARI capability will not be used. */
> static bool pcie_ari_disabled;
>
> @@ -4746,6 +4753,14 @@ static ssize_t pci_resource_alignment_store(struct bus_type *bus,
> BUS_ATTR(resource_alignment, 0644, pci_resource_alignment_show,
> pci_resource_alignment_store);
>
> +static void pci_resource_get_page_aligned(char *str)
> +{
> + if (!strncmp(str, "off", 3))
> + pci_resource_page_aligned = false;
> + else if (!strncmp(str, "on", 2))
> + pci_resource_page_aligned = true;
> +}
> +
> static int __init pci_resource_alignment_sysfs_init(void)
> {
> return bus_create_file(&pci_bus_type,
> @@ -4859,6 +4874,8 @@ static int __init pci_setup(char *str)
> } else if (!strncmp(str, "resource_alignment=", 19)) {
> pci_set_resource_alignment_param(str + 19,
> strlen(str + 19));
> + } else if (!strncmp(str, "resource_page_aligned=", 22)) {
> + pci_resource_get_page_aligned(str + 22);
> } else if (!strncmp(str, "ecrc=", 5)) {
> pcie_ecrc_get_policy(str + 5);
> } else if (!strncmp(str, "hpiosize=", 9)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index d390fc1..e16e48c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -312,11 +312,16 @@ static inline resource_size_t pci_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev,
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
> int resno = res - dev->resource;
>
> - if (resno >= PCI_IOV_RESOURCES && resno <= PCI_IOV_RESOURCE_END)
> + if (resno >= PCI_IOV_RESOURCES && resno <= PCI_IOV_RESOURCE_END) {
> + if (pci_resource_page_aligned && res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)
> + return PAGE_ALIGN(pci_sriov_resource_alignment(dev, resno));
> return pci_sriov_resource_alignment(dev, resno);
> + }
> #endif
> if (dev->class >> 8 == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_CARDBUS)
> return pci_cardbus_resource_alignment(res);
> + if (pci_resource_page_aligned && res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)
> + return PAGE_ALIGN(resource_alignment(res));
> return resource_alignment(res);
> }
Why are we calling resource_alignment() and then doing another
alignment on top of that? Shouldn't this alignment be done there? I
still don't really understand if this is enough to produce a
reallocation if the alignment is not sufficient, vfio would need to
know if pci_resource_page_aligned has any loopholes.
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 6ae25aa..0ca57f1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1517,6 +1517,8 @@ static inline int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
>
> #include
>
> +extern bool pci_resource_page_aligned;
> +
> /* these helpers provide future and backwards compatibility
> * for accessing popular PCI BAR info */
> #define pci_resource_start(dev, bar) ((dev)->resource[(bar)].start)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-04 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-31 8:50 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap sub-page MMIO BARs and MSI-X table on PPC64 platform Yongji Xie
2015-12-31 8:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: Add support for enforcing all MMIO BARs to be page aligned Yongji Xie
2016-01-04 20:47 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2016-01-05 11:04 ` Yongji Xie
2015-12-31 8:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap sub-page MMIO BARs if all MMIO BARs are " Yongji Xie
2015-12-31 8:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap MSI-X table if EEH is supported Yongji Xie
2016-01-04 21:07 ` Alex Williamson
2016-01-04 21:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-01-06 9:58 ` Yongji Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1451940460.6585.6.camel@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).