From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: add FSL_SOC dependency to drivers using FSL_LBC
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:47:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452196053.19133.23.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452194501-115280-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 11:21 -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> I've managed to construct .config files (for ppc64) that come across
> this Kconfig warning:
>
> warning: (MPC836x_RDK && MTD_NAND_FSL_ELBC && MTD_NAND_FSL_UPM) selects
> FSL_LBC which has unmet direct dependencies (FSL_SOC)
>
> Let's add the FSL_SOC dependency to the NAND drivers. AFAICT, they are
> only supported on PPC32 FSL SoCs anyway.
There are other problems, if you can enable an 83xx board on ppc64. PPC_83xx
does select FSL_SOC so I don't know why it's unmet.
FWIW, I think we should instead drop the FSL_SOC dependency from FSL_LBC. It
doesn't use anything that I can see from fsl_soc.c. It's been commonly abused
as a means for hiding the option on builds for other platforms, but that has
to stop anyway now that many of these devices are also on ARM-based chips.
eLBC isn't, since it was obsoleted by IFC, but it shouldn't be unnecessarily
different from IFC. IFC currently depends on FSL_SOC but that needs to go
away.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-07 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-07 19:21 [PATCH] mtd: nand: add FSL_SOC dependency to drivers using FSL_LBC Brian Norris
2016-01-07 19:47 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2016-01-07 20:34 ` Brian Norris
2016-01-07 20:40 ` Scott Wood
2016-01-07 20:45 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1452196053.19133.23.camel@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).