From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E22B1A0023 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:29:03 +1100 (AEDT) Message-ID: <1453159742.24878.0.camel@ellerman.id.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] ppc64le FTRACE_WITH_REGS implementation From: Michael Ellerman To: Jiri Kosina , Torsten Duwe , Steven Rostedt Cc: Denis Kirjanov , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:29:02 +1100 In-Reply-To: References: <20151125172608.9588569260@newverein.lst.de> <20151125172902.82C6C69260@newverein.lst.de> <20151201172914.GB5509@lst.de> <1449008285.12022.0.camel@ellerman.id.au> <20160105155857.GA2699@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 23:22 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Torsten Duwe wrote: > > > > I (still) haven't had a chance to have a good look at it, but I won't this week > > > anyway. So post v5 and hopefully I can review that and it will be perfect :) > > > > The perfect v5 is there now, for 4 weeks minus the holiday season, and > > no further problems arose. Independently verified by Petr Mladek -- > > don't forget his high-level fix. > > Hi everybody, > > so what are the current plans with this one, please? Is this going through > ppc tree, ftrace tree, or does it have issues that need to be worked on > before merging? Anton and I need to review it and then it will be merged via the powerpc tree. We just haven't had the spare cycles to do it. cheers