From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from host.buserror.net (host.buserror.net [209.198.135.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 434511A0026 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 07:42:41 +1100 (AEDT) Message-ID: <1454704951.2486.35.camel@buserror.net> From: Scott Wood To: Alessio Igor Bogani Cc: Kumar Gala , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:42:31 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <1453904726.27129.42.camel@buserror.net> <1453904822.27129.44.camel@buserror.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Question about 86xx List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 15:26 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote: > Scott, > > On 27 January 2016 at 15:41, Alessio Igor Bogani > wrote: > > Scott, > > > > On 27 January 2016 at 15:27, Scott Wood wrote: > > > On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 08:25 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 10:24 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote: > > [...] > > > > > I'm wondering if we are allowed to put together configurations of > > > > > the > > > > > 86xx base systems > > [...] > > > > > mpc86xx_defconfig/mpc86xx_smp_defconfig as like already done for > > > > > 85xx > > > > > ones. > > > > Yes, that would be good. > > There are 6 boards into arch/powerpc/configs/86xx directory. Five of > them are based on dual core 8641 whereas one is based on single core > 8610. How should I proceed? Use a single file (mpc86xx_defconfig) or > use two files (mpc86xx_defconfig and mpc86xx_smp_defconfig)? Use a fragment to enable SMP, like 85xx does. -Scott