From: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>
To: christophe lombard <clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Michael Neuling <michael.neuling@au1.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/18] cxl: Support to flash a new image on the adapter from a guest
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:19:10 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455577998-sup-2795@delenn.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56C23AE2.8050608@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Excerpts from christophe lombard's message of 2016-02-16 07:53:54 +1100:
> >> +void cxl_guest_reload_module(struct cxl *adapter)
> >> +{
> >> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> >> + int afu;
> >> +
> >> + for (afu = 0; afu < adapter->slices; afu++)
> >> + cxl_guest_remove_afu(adapter->afu[afu]);
> > Should we possibly have done this part earlier?
> >
> > I'd think it should be done before any operation that might lead to us
> > resetting the card. Probably the safest thing is to do it when the first
> > chunk is handed to the kernel so we can make sure it's safe, and return
> > -EBUSY if any of the AFUs are still in use.
> Not necessary. PowerVM - phyp - refuses any type of action when an operation
> of download/validation is in progress. The reverse is true as well.
I was more thinking about what could happen in the short window between
when phyp resets the card and is potentially accepting new operations
and when we remove the old AFUs from Linux - could anything bad happen
if someone e.g. did an attach at that moment and Linux still had
outdated info left over from the previous AFU?
Cheers,
-Ian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-06 13:28 [PATCH v3 00/18] cxl: Add support for powerVM guest Frederic Barrat
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 01/18] cxl: Move common code away from bare-metal-specific files Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 6:26 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 02/18] cxl: Move bare-metal specific code to specialized files Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 6:28 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 03/18] cxl: Define process problem state area at attach time only Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 6:32 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-11 14:40 ` Frederic Barrat
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 04/18] cxl: Introduce implementation-specific API Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 7:07 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 05/18] cxl: Rename some bare-metal specific functions Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 7:10 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 06/18] cxl: Isolate a few bare-metal-specific calls Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 7:12 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 07/18] cxl: Update cxl_irq() prototype Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 7:13 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 08/18] cxl: IRQ allocation for guests Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 7:23 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 09/18] cxl: New possible return value from hcall Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 7:24 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 10/18] cxl: New hcalls to support CAPI adapters Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 8:31 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 11/18] cxl: Separate bare-metal fields in adapter and AFU data structures Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 9:04 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 12/18] cxl: Add guest-specific code Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 9:35 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:29 ` [PATCH v3 13/18] cxl: sysfs support for guests Frederic Barrat
2016-02-08 3:02 ` Stewart Smith
2016-02-09 15:21 ` Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 6:22 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-10 9:38 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:29 ` [PATCH v3 14/18] cxl: Support to flash a new image on the adapter from a guest Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 11:20 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-15 20:53 ` christophe lombard
2016-02-15 23:19 ` Ian Munsie [this message]
2016-02-16 10:47 ` christophe lombard
2016-02-06 13:29 ` [PATCH v3 15/18] cxl: Parse device tree and create CAPI device(s) at boot Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 11:21 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:29 ` [PATCH v3 16/18] cxl: Support the cxl kernel API from a guest Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 11:26 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:29 ` [PATCH v3 17/18] cxl: Adapter failure handling Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 11:28 ` Ian Munsie
2016-02-06 13:29 ` [PATCH v3 18/18] cxl: Add tracepoints around the CAPI hcall Frederic Barrat
2016-02-10 11:29 ` Ian Munsie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455577998-sup-2795@delenn.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=imunsie@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael.neuling@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).