From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp06.au.ibm.com (e23smtp06.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 021861A033E for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:46:00 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:45:59 +1000 Received: from d23relay06.au.ibm.com (d23relay06.au.ibm.com [9.185.63.219]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A77C3578071 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:45:54 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay06.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u1H3jksR6881708 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:45:54 +1100 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u1H3jIP8013081 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:45:21 +1100 From: Gavin Shan To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, aik@ozlabs.ru, dja@axtens.net, bhelgaas@google.com, robherring2@gmail.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, Gavin Shan Subject: [PATCH v8 20/45] powerpc/powernv: Allocate PE# in reverse order Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:44:03 +1100 Message-Id: <1455680668-23298-21-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1455680668-23298-1-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1455680668-23298-1-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , PE number for one particular PE can be allocated dynamically or reserved according to the consumed M64 (64-bits prefetchable) segments of the PE. The M64 resources, and hence their segments and PE number are assigned/reserved in ascending order. The PE numbers are allocated dynamically in ascending order as well. It's not a problem as the PE numbers are reserved and then allocated all at once in fine order. However, it will introduce conflicts when PCI hotplug is supported: the PE number to be reserved for newly added PE might have been assigned. To resolve above conflicts, this forces the PE number to be allocated dynamically in reverse order. With this patch applied, the PE numbers are reserved in ascending order, but allocated dynamically in reverse order. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan --- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c index f182ca7..565725b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c @@ -144,16 +144,14 @@ static void pnv_ioda_reserve_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no) static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb) { - unsigned long pe; + unsigned long pe = phb->ioda.total_pe_num - 1; - do { - pe = find_next_zero_bit(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, - phb->ioda.total_pe_num, 0); - if (pe >= phb->ioda.total_pe_num) - return NULL; - } while(test_and_set_bit(pe, phb->ioda.pe_alloc)); + for (pe = phb->ioda.total_pe_num - 1; pe >= 0; pe--) { + if (!test_and_set_bit(pe, phb->ioda.pe_alloc)) + return pnv_ioda_init_pe(phb, pe); + } - return pnv_ioda_init_pe(phb, pe); + return NULL; } static void pnv_ioda_free_pe(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe) -- 2.1.0