From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from russell.cc (russell.cc [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee0:3370]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61D651A0BB5 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:04:47 +1100 (AEDT) Message-ID: <1456880682.4528.5.camel@russell.cc> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/eeh: Enhancement to EEH for VF From: Russell Currey To: Gavin Shan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 12:04:42 +1100 In-Reply-To: <1456445092-18337-1-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1456445092-18337-1-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 11:04 +1100, Gavin Shan wrote: > Those patches are based on the series of patches supporting EEH for VF, > which is pending for merging: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/581315/ > > This series of patches fixes couple of issue that resides in previous > patchset: > >    * The error handlers provided by vfio-pci driver shouldn't be called. >      Otherwise, the guest is simply killed. >    * When we have partially hoplug in error recovery, we shouldn't remove >      those passed-through devices. Otherwise, the guest will be brought >      to undefined situation. >    * When we have errors detected on PF PE, hold VF PE that has been > passed >      through to guest until the recovery on PF PE is done > > Gavin Shan (3): >   powerpc/eeh: Don't propagate error to guest >   powerpc/eeh: Don't remove passed VFs >   powerpc/eeh: Synchronize recovery in host/guest > >  arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c        | 11 +++++++++++ >  arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 13 ++++++++----- >  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > For the whole series (incorporating my comments on patch 3): Reviewed-by: Russell Currey