From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [3/3] powerpc/pseries: Cleanup property cloning in memory dlpar
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 12:47:06 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456883226.24490.4.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160301230231.DA2A81402D8@ozlabs.org>
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 10:02 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-02 at 17:13:29 UTC, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> > Now that the DLPAR add/remove flow updates the ibm,dynamic-memory device
> > tree property each time we add or remove a LMB the work needed to clone
> > this property can be reduced.
> >
> > Prior to performing any memory DLPAR operation we now clone the device
> > tree property once and convert it to cpu format. This copy is then used
> > to walk through LMBs as we process them and is thrown away when we
> > are finished. There is no longer a need to convert the entire property to
> > cpu format and then back to BE every time we update it, we can just parse
> > it in its native BE format and update the one LMB we need to modify
> > before updating the property.
> >
> > This patch removes the BE => cpu conversion step in the clone routine and
> > creates a drconf_property_to_cpu() routine to make this conversion for the
> > one time we need to convert the entire property. This then allows us
> > to remove dlpar_update_drconf_property() since we can now do everything
> > in dlpar_update_device_tree_lmb().
>
> Hi Nathan,
>
> This sounds like a good cleanup on the face of it.
>
> But even with it applied I still see a boat load of endian errors from sparse
> in this file. That worries me, can you please try and fix them.
I can merge patches 1 and 2 if you like, and leave this one for you to fixup?
Or I can just wait for a v2 of the whole series. Let me know which you'd
prefer.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-10 17:08 [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/pseries: Update affinity index during memory dlpar Nathan Fontenot
2016-02-10 17:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/pseries: Refactor dlpar_add_lmb() code Nathan Fontenot
2016-04-11 12:35 ` [1/3] " Michael Ellerman
2016-02-10 17:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/pseries: Update LMB associativity index during DLPAR add/remove Nathan Fontenot
2016-04-11 12:35 ` [2/3] " Michael Ellerman
2016-02-10 17:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/pseries: Cleanup property cloning in memory dlpar Nathan Fontenot
2016-03-01 23:02 ` [3/3] " Michael Ellerman
2016-03-02 1:47 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2016-03-04 3:45 ` Nathan Fontenot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1456883226.24490.4.camel@ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).