From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Torsten Duwe <torsten@lst.de>, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
jeyu@redhat.com, jkosina@suse.cz, jikos@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] ppc64 livepatch: frameless klp_return_helper using odd TOC
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 22:06:26 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458817586.3742.1.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160324080449.GA13139@lst.de>
On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 09:04 +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:23:01PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > On 24/03/16 02:58, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. Heuristics are bad. The better they are, the more subtly the
> > > way they might fail.
> [...]
>
> This CR+4 code leaves only 1 slot, so sibling calls are extremely dangerous,
> as I mentioned. But with a little attention, this patch works very well.
>
> I mostly wanted to hear opinions about a transient odd TOC value
> before I start polishing.
Hi Torsten,
I just posted the version I've been working on. I prefer it, but you'll
probably tell me that there's some horrible case it doesn't handle correctly :)
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-24 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-23 15:58 [PATCH/RFC] ppc64 livepatch: frameless klp_return_helper using odd TOC Torsten Duwe
2016-03-24 2:23 ` Balbir Singh
2016-03-24 8:04 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-03-24 11:06 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2016-03-24 10:14 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-03-24 10:27 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-03-24 15:58 ` Kamalesh Babulal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1458817586.3742.1.camel@ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torsten@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).