linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2 v2] powerpc/iommu: Remove the dependency on EEH struct in DDW mechanism
Date: Wed,  6 Apr 2016 21:20:05 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459988405-13991-2-git-send-email-gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459988405-13991-1-git-send-email-gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Commit 39baadbf36ce ("powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh information from pci_dn")
changed the pci_dn struct by removing its EEH-related members.
As part of this clean-up, DDW mechanism was modified to read the device
configuration address from eeh_dev struct.

As a consequence, now if we disable EEH mechanism on kernel command-line
for example, the DDW mechanism will fail, generating a kernel oops by
dereferencing a NULL pointer (which turns to be the eeh_dev pointer).

This patch just changes the configuration address calculation on DDW
functions to a manual calculation based on pci_dn members instead of
using eeh_dev-based address.

No functional changes were made. This was tested on pSeries, both
in PHyp and qemu guest.

Fixes: 39baadbf36ce ("powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh information from pci_dn")
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
index bd98ce2..3db2cea 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
@@ -912,7 +912,8 @@ machine_arch_initcall(pseries, find_existing_ddw_windows);
 static int query_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, const u32 *ddw_avail,
 			struct ddw_query_response *query)
 {
-	struct eeh_dev *edev;
+	struct device_node *dn;
+	struct pci_dn *pdn;
 	u32 cfg_addr;
 	u64 buid;
 	int ret;
@@ -923,11 +924,10 @@ static int query_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, const u32 *ddw_avail,
 	 * Retrieve them from the pci device, not the node with the
 	 * dma-window property
 	 */
-	edev = pci_dev_to_eeh_dev(dev);
-	cfg_addr = edev->config_addr;
-	if (edev->pe_config_addr)
-		cfg_addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
-	buid = edev->phb->buid;
+	dn = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev);
+	pdn = PCI_DN(dn);
+	cfg_addr = (pdn->busno << 8) | (pdn->devfn);
+	buid = pdn->phb->buid;
 
 	ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[0], 3, 5, (u32 *)query,
 		  cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid));
@@ -941,7 +941,8 @@ static int create_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, const u32 *ddw_avail,
 			struct ddw_create_response *create, int page_shift,
 			int window_shift)
 {
-	struct eeh_dev *edev;
+	struct device_node *dn;
+	struct pci_dn *pdn;
 	u32 cfg_addr;
 	u64 buid;
 	int ret;
@@ -952,11 +953,10 @@ static int create_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, const u32 *ddw_avail,
 	 * Retrieve them from the pci device, not the node with the
 	 * dma-window property
 	 */
-	edev = pci_dev_to_eeh_dev(dev);
-	cfg_addr = edev->config_addr;
-	if (edev->pe_config_addr)
-		cfg_addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
-	buid = edev->phb->buid;
+	dn = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev);
+	pdn = PCI_DN(dn);
+	cfg_addr = (pdn->busno << 8) | (pdn->devfn);
+	buid = pdn->phb->buid;
 
 	do {
 		/* extra outputs are LIOBN and dma-addr (hi, lo) */
-- 
2.1.0

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-07  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-07  0:20 [PATCH 1/2 v2] Revert "powerpc/eeh: Fix crash in eeh_add_device_early() on Cell" Guilherme G. Piccoli
2016-04-07  0:20 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli [this message]
2016-04-07  0:48   ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] powerpc/iommu: Remove the dependency on EEH struct in DDW mechanism Gavin Shan
2016-04-07  1:55     ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2016-04-07  0:35 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] Revert "powerpc/eeh: Fix crash in eeh_add_device_early() on Cell" Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1459988405-13991-2-git-send-email-gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).