From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp03.au.ibm.com (e23smtp03.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3qgQzL5Tj9zDq64 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:10:22 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost by e23smtp03.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:10:21 +1000 Received: from d23relay10.au.ibm.com (d23relay10.au.ibm.com [9.190.26.77]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374813578056 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:10:12 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay10.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u3729wMG62521504 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:10:06 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u37296BZ016455 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:09:06 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Ian Munsie To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" Cc: mikey , Michael C Hollinger , Frederic Barrat , linux-pci , "Matthew R. Ochs" , gwshan , Manoj Kumar , paulus , "andrew.donnellan" , bhelgaas , linuxppc-dev , Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc/pci: Assign fixed PHB number based on device-tree properties In-reply-to: <570584EF.1010904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1458337746-20337-1-git-send-email-gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1459971134-sup-6269@x230.ozlabs.ibm.com> <570584EF.1010904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 21:08:03 -0500 Message-Id: <1459994859-sup-3399@x230.ozlabs.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Excerpts from Guilherme G. Piccoli's message of 2016-04-06 16:51:43 -0500: > And in the case a virtual PHB grabs the bitmap before, we just need to > add Michael's suggested check and fallback to bitmap PHB numbering in > this case. > > Do you think this is enough to avoid issues with cxl'a virtual PHBs? Yep, that should be fine :) Cheers, -Ian