From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3qlCGD4m1PzDq5k for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:36:20 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <1460525779.30704.7.camel@ellerman.id.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 00/28] Add new powerpc specific ELF core notes From: Michael Ellerman To: Edjunior Barbosa Machado , Laurent Dufour , Anshuman Khandual , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: mikey@neuling.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com, avagin@openvz.org, Paul.Clothier@imgtec.com, davem@davemloft.net, peterz@infradead.org, palves@redhat.com, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, oleg@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com, Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com, kirjanov@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, davej@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:36:19 +1000 In-Reply-To: <570B4508.6060806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1455613198-5113-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <57062722.5090706@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5EA48413-85A1-4CB7-8843-CE22B2BB1F08@ellerman.id.au> <570B4508.6060806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 03:32 -0300, Edjunior Barbosa Machado wrote: > Hi Michael, Anshuman, > > I've managed to implement the GDB support for the new regsets and test > on Power8 (BE and LE). Great work thanks! > The following is an example of GDB 'info > registers all' partial output showing the new registers when inside a > suspended transaction on Power8 LE using this patchset. Please let me > know if you need any additional information or tests from GDB side. What's the plan for merging the gdb changes? > (gdb) info registers all > ... > dscr 0x0 0 > ppr 0xc000000000000 3377699720527872 > tar 0x0 0 > ebbrr > ebbhr > bescr > siar > sdar > sier > mmcr2 > mmcr0 > tfhar 0x10002b30 268446512 > texasr 0x110000098000001 76561196215435265 > tfiar 0x10002ad9 268446425 > cr0 0x10002b2c 268446508 Using 'c' as the prefix is a bit confusing here, as 'cr0' is usually used to refer to the CR0 field of CR. Speaking of which, I don't see CR here? Or is it somewhere above in the ... ? Maybe the prefix could be 'c_' ? Or do other arches already use 'c' as the prefix? Otherwise looks good. cheers