From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/17] perf powerpc: Fix kprobe and kretprobe handling with kallsyms on ppc64le
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 21:29:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462494580-27164-15-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462494580-27164-1-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
So far, we used to treat probe point offsets as being offset from the
LEP. However, userspace applications (objdump/readelf) always show
disassembly and offsets from the function GEP. This is confusing to the
user as we will end up probing at an address different from what the
user expects when looking at the function disassembly with
readelf/objdump. Fix this by changing how we modify probe address with
perf.
If only the function name is provided, we assume the user needs the LEP.
Otherwise, if an offset is specified, we assume that the user knows the
exact address to probe based on function disassembly, and so we just
place the probe from the GEP offset.
Finally, kretprobe was also broken with kallsyms as we were trying to
specify an offset. This patch also fixes that issue.
Reported-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/75df860aad8216bf4b9bcd10c6351ecc0e3dee54.1460451721.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/sym-handling.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/sym-handling.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/sym-handling.c
index bbc1a50768dd..6974ba0fa065 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/sym-handling.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/sym-handling.c
@@ -71,12 +71,21 @@ void arch__fix_tev_from_maps(struct perf_probe_event *pev,
struct probe_trace_event *tev, struct map *map)
{
/*
- * ppc64 ABIv2 local entry point is currently always 2 instructions
- * (8 bytes) after the global entry point.
+ * When probing at a function entry point, we normally always want the
+ * LEP since that catches calls to the function through both the GEP and
+ * the LEP. Hence, we would like to probe at an offset of 8 bytes if
+ * the user only specified the function entry.
+ *
+ * However, if the user specifies an offset, we fall back to using the
+ * GEP since all userspace applications (objdump/readelf) show function
+ * disassembly with offsets from the GEP.
+ *
+ * In addition, we shouldn't specify an offset for kretprobes.
*/
- if (!pev->uprobes && map->dso->symtab_type == DSO_BINARY_TYPE__KALLSYMS) {
- tev->point.address += PPC64LE_LEP_OFFSET;
+ if (pev->point.offset || pev->point.retprobe || !map)
+ return;
+
+ if (map->dso->symtab_type == DSO_BINARY_TYPE__KALLSYMS)
tev->point.offset += PPC64LE_LEP_OFFSET;
- }
}
#endif
--
2.5.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-06 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-06 0:29 [GIT PULL 00/17] perf/core improvements and fixes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-05-06 0:29 ` [PATCH 06/17] perf tools powerpc: Add support for generating bpf prologue Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-05-06 0:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2016-05-06 0:29 ` [PATCH 15/17] perf symbols: Fix kallsyms perf test on ppc64le Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-05-06 6:36 ` [GIT PULL 00/17] perf/core improvements and fixes Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1462494580-27164-15-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).