linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, johnyoun@synopsys.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>,
	a.seppala@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: usb: dwc2: regression on MyBook Live Duo / Canyonlands since 4.3.0-rc4
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 08:37:52 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462833472.20290.129.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4908563.V9YuKsSrTJ@wuerfel>

On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 17:08 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> Unfortunately, I don't see any way this could be done in MIPS specific
> code: There is typically a byteswap between the internal bus and the PCI
> bus on big-endian MIPS systems, so the PCI MMIO ends up being little-endian,

Ugh ... not exactly, re-watch my talk on the matter :-) While there is
a specific lane wiring to preserve byte addresss, in the end it's the
end device itself that is either BE or LE. Regardless of any "bus
endianness".
 
> which matches the expected behavior of readl/writel. However, drivers
> for non-PCI devices often use the same readl/writel accessors because
> that is how it's done on ARMv6/ARMv7.

Even then, you can have on-SoC (non-PCI) devices that also have a
different endianness from the main CPU. How does it work on ARM for
example ? The device endianness should be fixed, regardless of the
endianness of the core, no ?

> Doing it hardcoded by architecture is just the simplest way to deal
> with it, working on the assumption that nothing actually needs the
> runtime detection that Ben suggested. 

No, it's not an archicture problem. It's a problem specific to that one
SoC that the device was synthetized to be a certain endian while it was
synthetized differently on another SoC... that also happens to be a
different architecture. But doesn't have to.

For example, we had in the past cases of both LE and BE EHCI
implementations on the same architecture (PowerPC).

> Detecting the endianess of the
> device is probably the best future-proof solution, but it's also
> considerably more work to do in the driver, and comes with a
> tiny runtime overhead.

The runtime overhead is probably non-measurable compared with the cost
of the actual MMIOs.

Cheers,
Ben.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-09 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-07 22:54 usb: dwc2: regression on MyBook Live Duo / Canyonlands since 4.3.0-rc4 Christian Lamparter
2016-05-08 10:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-05-08 11:44   ` Christian Lamparter
2016-05-09  0:23     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-05-09 10:36       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-09 10:39         ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-09 15:08           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-09 19:06             ` Christian Lamparter
2016-05-09 20:10               ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-09 22:43               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-05-09 22:37             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2016-05-10  7:23               ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-12  9:58                 ` Christian Lamparter
2016-05-12 11:55                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-12 13:30                     ` Christian Lamparter
2016-05-12 18:40                       ` John Youn
2016-05-12 20:39                         ` Christian Lamparter
2016-05-12 20:50                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-12 20:55                           ` John Youn
2016-05-14 13:11                         ` Christian Lamparter
2016-05-14 19:45                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-17 23:50                           ` John Youn
2016-05-18 19:14                             ` Christian Lamparter
2016-05-18 21:09                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-19  0:36                               ` John Youn
2016-05-12 22:17                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-05-09 22:33           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-05-09 14:02         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-05-09 20:22         ` John Youn
2016-05-09 20:38           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-09 21:11             ` John Youn
2016-05-09 21:30               ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1462833472.20290.129.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=a.seppala@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
    --cc=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johnyoun@synopsys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).