From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH v2] tools/perf: Fix the mask in regs_dump__printf and
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:14:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466412241-27502-1-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
When decoding the perf_regs mask in regs_dump__printf(),
we loop through the mask using find_first_bit and find_next_bit functions.
"mask" is of type "u64", but sent as a "unsigned long *" to
lib functions along with sizeof(). While the exisitng code works fine in
most of the case, the logic is broken when using a 32bit perf on a
64bit kernel (Big Endian). We end up reading the wrong word of the u64
first in the lib functions. Proposed fix is to swap the words of the
u64 to handle this case. This is not endianess swap.
Suggested-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changelog v1:
1)updated commit message and patch subject
2)Add the fix to print_sample_iregs() in builtin-script.c
tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 7 ++++++-
tools/perf/util/session.c | 7 ++++++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
index e3ce2f34d3ad..76d5006ebcc3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
@@ -412,11 +412,16 @@ static void print_sample_iregs(struct perf_sample *sample,
struct regs_dump *regs = &sample->intr_regs;
uint64_t mask = attr->sample_regs_intr;
unsigned i = 0, r;
+ unsigned long _mask[sizeof(mask)/sizeof(unsigned long)];
if (!regs)
return;
- for_each_set_bit(r, (unsigned long *) &mask, sizeof(mask) * 8) {
+ _mask[0] = mask & ULONG_MAX;
+ if (sizeof(mask) > sizeof(unsigned long))
+ _mask[1] = mask >> 32;
+
+ for_each_set_bit(r, _mask, sizeof(mask) * 8) {
u64 val = regs->regs[i++];
printf("%5s:0x%"PRIx64" ", perf_reg_name(r), val);
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
index 5214974e841a..2eaa42a4832a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
@@ -940,8 +940,13 @@ static void branch_stack__printf(struct perf_sample *sample)
static void regs_dump__printf(u64 mask, u64 *regs)
{
unsigned rid, i = 0;
+ unsigned long _mask[sizeof(mask)/sizeof(unsigned long)];
- for_each_set_bit(rid, (unsigned long *) &mask, sizeof(mask) * 8) {
+ _mask[0] = mask & ULONG_MAX;
+ if (sizeof(mask) > sizeof(unsigned long))
+ _mask[1] = mask >> 32;
+
+ for_each_set_bit(rid, _mask, sizeof(mask) * 8) {
u64 val = regs[i++];
printf(".... %-5s 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-06-20 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-20 8:44 Madhavan Srinivasan [this message]
2016-06-20 9:18 ` [PATCH v2] tools/perf: Fix the mask in regs_dump__printf and Jiri Olsa
2016-06-20 9:27 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-06-20 9:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-06-20 9:52 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-06-20 9:19 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1466412241-27502-1-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=ynorov@caviumnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).