From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, Waiman.Long@hpe.com,
boqun.feng@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:41:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467049290-32359-2-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467049290-32359-1-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
this supports to fix lock holder preempted issue which run as a guest
for kernel users, we could use bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) to detech
if one vcpu is preempted or not.
The default implementation is a macrodefined by false. So compiler can
wrap it out if arch dose not support such vcpu pteempted check.
archs can implement it by define arch_vcpu_is_preempted().
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 6e42ada..dc0a9c3 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -3293,6 +3293,15 @@ static inline void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+#ifdef arch_vcpu_is_preempted
+static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
+{
+ return arch_vcpu_is_preempted(cpu);
+}
+#else
+#define vcpu_is_preempted(cpu) false
+#endif
+
extern long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *new_mask);
extern long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask);
--
2.4.11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-27 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-27 17:41 [PATCH 0/3] implement vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-06-27 17:41 ` Pan Xinhui [this message]
2016-06-27 14:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-27 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-28 3:14 ` xinhui
2016-06-28 7:00 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-06-28 9:47 ` xinhui
2016-06-27 14:05 ` Boqun Feng
2016-06-28 3:15 ` xinhui
2016-06-27 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-06-27 14:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-28 3:23 ` xinhui
2016-06-27 14:58 ` Boqun Feng
2016-06-28 3:39 ` xinhui
2016-06-28 5:03 ` Boqun Feng
2016-06-28 5:38 ` xinhui
2016-06-27 17:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() Pan Xinhui
2016-06-27 14:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467049290-32359-2-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).