From: "Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, anton@samba.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, bsingharora@gmail.com,
David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, arnd@arndb.de,
"Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] cpuidle: Fix last_residency division
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 02:06:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467183971-12327-1-git-send-email-shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Snooze is a poll idle state in powernv and pseries platforms. Snooze
has a timeout so that if a cpu stays in snooze for more than target
residency of the next available idle state, then it would exit thereby
giving chance to the cpuidle governor to re-evaluate and
promote the cpu to a deeper idle state. Therefore whenever snooze exits
due to this timeout, its last_residency will be target_residency of next
deeper state.
commit e93e59ce5b85 ("cpuidle: Replace ktime_get() with local_clock()")
changed the math around last_residency calculation. Specifically, while
converting last_residency value from nanoseconds to microseconds it does
right shift by 10. Due to this, in snooze timeout exit scenarios
last_residency calculated is roughly 2.3% less than target_residency of
next available state. This pattern is picked up get_typical_interval()
in the menu governor and therefore expected_interval in menu_select() is
frequently less than the target_residency of any state but snooze.
Due to this we are entering snooze at a higher rate, thereby affecting
the single thread performance.
Fix this by using a better approximation for division by 1000.
Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Bisected-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by David Laight <david.laight@aculab.com>
Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changes in v3
=============
- Using approximation suggested by David
Changes in v2
=============
- Fixing it in the cpuidle core code instead of driver code.
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 11 +++--------
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
index a4d0059..e9a7f74 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
struct cpuidle_state *target_state = &drv->states[index];
bool broadcast = !!(target_state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP);
u64 time_start, time_end;
- s64 diff;
/*
* Tell the time framework to switch to a broadcast timer because our
@@ -218,14 +217,10 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
local_irq_enable();
/*
- * local_clock() returns the time in nanosecond, let's shift
- * by 10 (divide by 1024) to have microsecond based time.
+ * local_clock() returns the time in nanosecond, convert it to
+ * microsecond based time.
*/
- diff = (time_end - time_start) >> 10;
- if (diff > INT_MAX)
- diff = INT_MAX;
-
- dev->last_residency = (int) diff;
+ dev->last_residency = convert_nsec_to_usec(time_end - time_start);
if (entered_state >= 0) {
/* Update cpuidle counters */
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
index f87f399..c8ea5ad 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
@@ -68,4 +68,27 @@ static inline void cpuidle_coupled_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
}
#endif
+/*
+ * Used for calculating last_residency in usec. Optimized for case
+ * where last_residency in nsecs is < INT_MAX/2 by using faster
+ * approximation. Approximated value has less than 1% error.
+ */
+static inline int convert_nsec_to_usec(u64 nsec)
+{
+ if (likely(nsec < INT_MAX / 2)) {
+ int usec = (int)nsec;
+
+ usec += usec >> 5;
+ usec = usec >> 10;
+ return usec;
+ } else {
+ u64 usec = div_u64(nsec, 1000);
+
+ if (usec > INT_MAX)
+ usec = INT_MAX;
+ return (int)usec;
+ }
+}
+
+
#endif /* __DRIVER_CPUIDLE_H */
--
2.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2016-06-29 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-29 7:06 Shreyas B. Prabhu [this message]
2016-06-29 7:37 ` [PATCH v3] cpuidle: Fix last_residency division Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-29 8:59 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
2016-06-29 15:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-06-29 15:52 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-06-30 14:20 ` Shreyas B Prabhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467183971-12327-1-git-send-email-shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).