linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, anton@samba.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, bsingharora@gmail.com,
	David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, arnd@arndb.de,
	"Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] cpuidle: Fix last_residency division
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 02:06:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467183971-12327-1-git-send-email-shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

Snooze is a poll idle state in powernv and pseries platforms. Snooze
has a timeout so that if a cpu stays in snooze for more than target
residency of the next available idle state, then it would exit thereby
giving chance to the cpuidle governor to re-evaluate and
promote the cpu to a deeper idle state. Therefore whenever snooze exits
due to this timeout, its last_residency will be target_residency of next
deeper state.

commit e93e59ce5b85 ("cpuidle: Replace ktime_get() with local_clock()")
changed the math around last_residency calculation. Specifically, while
converting last_residency value from nanoseconds to microseconds it does
right shift by 10. Due to this, in snooze timeout exit scenarios
last_residency calculated is roughly 2.3% less than target_residency of
next available state. This pattern is picked up get_typical_interval()
in the menu governor and therefore expected_interval in menu_select() is
frequently less than the target_residency of any state but snooze.

Due to this we are entering snooze at a higher rate, thereby affecting
the single thread performance.

Fix this by using a better approximation for division by 1000.

Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Bisected-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by David Laight <david.laight@aculab.com>
Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changes in v3
=============
 - Using approximation suggested by David

Changes in v2
=============
 - Fixing it in the cpuidle core code instead of driver code.

 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 11 +++--------
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
index a4d0059..e9a7f74 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
 	struct cpuidle_state *target_state = &drv->states[index];
 	bool broadcast = !!(target_state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP);
 	u64 time_start, time_end;
-	s64 diff;
 
 	/*
 	 * Tell the time framework to switch to a broadcast timer because our
@@ -218,14 +217,10 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
 		local_irq_enable();
 
 	/*
-	 * local_clock() returns the time in nanosecond, let's shift
-	 * by 10 (divide by 1024) to have microsecond based time.
+	 * local_clock() returns the time in nanosecond, convert it to
+	 * microsecond based time.
 	 */
-	diff = (time_end - time_start) >> 10;
-	if (diff > INT_MAX)
-		diff = INT_MAX;
-
-	dev->last_residency = (int) diff;
+	dev->last_residency = convert_nsec_to_usec(time_end - time_start);
 
 	if (entered_state >= 0) {
 		/* Update cpuidle counters */
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
index f87f399..c8ea5ad 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h
@@ -68,4 +68,27 @@ static inline void cpuidle_coupled_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
 }
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * Used for calculating last_residency in usec. Optimized for case
+ * where last_residency in nsecs is < INT_MAX/2 by using faster
+ * approximation. Approximated value has less than 1% error.
+ */
+static inline int convert_nsec_to_usec(u64 nsec)
+{
+	if (likely(nsec < INT_MAX / 2)) {
+		int usec = (int)nsec;
+
+		usec += usec >> 5;
+		usec = usec >> 10;
+		return usec;
+	} else {
+		u64 usec = div_u64(nsec, 1000);
+
+		if (usec > INT_MAX)
+			usec = INT_MAX;
+		return (int)usec;
+	}
+}
+
+
 #endif /* __DRIVER_CPUIDLE_H */
-- 
2.1.4

             reply	other threads:[~2016-06-29  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-29  7:06 Shreyas B. Prabhu [this message]
2016-06-29  7:37 ` [PATCH v3] cpuidle: Fix last_residency division Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-29  8:59   ` Shreyas B Prabhu
2016-06-29 15:01   ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-06-29 15:52     ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-06-30 14:20     ` Shreyas B Prabhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1467183971-12327-1-git-send-email-shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).