From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rjdSL1MhyzDqlj for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 17:09:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-pa0-x242.google.com (mail-pa0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rjdSK16sXz9s5J for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 17:09:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pa0-x242.google.com with SMTP id us13so15157829pab.1 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:09:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Axtens To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: Daniel Axtens Subject: [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/kvm: Clarify __user annotations Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 17:09:37 +1000 Message-Id: <1467616182-30886-1-git-send-email-dja@axtens.net> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , kvmppc_h_put_tce_indirect labels a u64 pointer as __user. It also labelled the u64 where get_user puts the result as __user. This isn't a pointer and so doesn't need to be labelled __user. Split the u64 value definition onto a new line to make it clear that it doesn't get the annotation. Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c index 18cf6d1f8174..c379ff5a4438 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c @@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ long kvmppc_h_put_tce_indirect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *stt; long i, ret = H_SUCCESS, idx; unsigned long entry, ua = 0; - u64 __user *tces, tce; + u64 __user *tces; + u64 tce; stt = kvmppc_find_table(vcpu, liobn); if (!stt) -- 2.1.4