From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix oops in pcibios_release_device() after pcibios_free_controller()
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:55:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467687331.13965.27.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467683085-3537-1-git-send-email-mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 22:44 -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> It's possible to hit an oops/crash if pcibios_release_device() accesses the
> phb struct and it had been freed earlier -- by pcibios_free_controller() --
> as the memory it pointed to can be reused.
>
> If after reuse 'phb->controller_ops.release_device' is non-NULL it will be
> called, but it points to an invalid location (that function pointer is not
> set anywhere in the code, so if it's non-NULL, that's not correct), and so
> it hits an oops and the system crashes.
>
> The solution is to verify whether 'phb' is still in 'hose_list' before any
> access to it in pcibios_release_device() -- as it is removed from the list
> by pcibios_free_controller() -- and ensure it cannot be used after kfree().
>
> That problem can happen with the pSeries platform's DLPAR remove operation
> if references to devices are held until after the pcibios_free_controller()
> function runs, and then released - exercising pcibios_release_device() path.
Have you considered instead adding a kref to the PHB and only freeing
it when all devices have been freed ? Or it's too hard to tract device
creation ?
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-05 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-05 1:44 [PATCH] powerpc: fix oops in pcibios_release_device() after pcibios_free_controller() Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2016-07-05 2:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2016-07-05 13:34 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2016-07-12 23:07 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2016-07-13 13:52 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467687331.13965.27.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).