linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Rashmica Gupta <rashmicy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v4] powerpc: Export thread_struct.used_vr/used_vsr to user space
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 23:21:18 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467897678.27157.45.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <577E5534.70300@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 15:12 +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> 
> Basically, CRIU checkpoints the process register's state through the
> ptrace API, and it restores it through a signal frame at restart time.
> This is quite odd but that the way it works on all the CRIU's supported
> architectures.
> 
> Obviously everything is done from/in user space, so the sigframe
> building too.
> Since we can't know from user space if the thread has used or not the
> Altivec/VSX registers, since we can't rely on the MSR bits, we always
> dump these registers.

Right, however is that an issue ? These days with glibc using V{M,S}X
for things like memcpy I would think there is little to gain in trying
to avoid dumping them.

> > Alternately, when restoring, can you setup the sigframe with the Altivec/VSX
> > fields populated, and the kernel will then load them, regardless of whether
> > they were actually used or not prior to the checkpoint?
> 
> In the case of Altivec/VSX fields, we currently force the kernel to
> retrieve them from the signal frame by setting MSR_VEC/MSR_VSX so
> restore_sigcontext() will copy them to the kernel thread's state.

Yup, that's the way to go.

> However this doesn't touch to used_vsr and used_vr which may remain at 0.

That would be a kernel bug.

> Most of the time this is fine, but in the case a thread which has really
> used those registers is catching a signal just after the restore and
> before it has touched to these registers again (and so set used_vsr/vr),
> these registers will not be pushed in the newly built signal frame since
> setup_sigcontext() check for used_vsr/vr before pushing the registers on
> the stack.
> This may be an issue in the case the thread wants to changed those
> registers (don't ask me why :)) in the stacked signal frame from the
> signal handler since they will not be there...
> 
> Being able to get and set the used_vr and used_vsr thread's variables,
> fixes this issue.

I think the right fix is that if a restore_sigcontext() has the MSR bits set,
it should set the corresponding used_* flag.

Or is there a reason why that won't work ?

Cheers,
Ben.

> Cheers,
> Laurent.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-07 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-07  7:49 [PATCH v4] powerpc: Export thread_struct.used_vr/used_vsr to user space wei.guo.simon
2016-07-07 11:15 ` [v4] " Michael Ellerman
2016-07-07 13:12   ` Laurent Dufour
2016-07-07 13:21     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2016-07-07 13:29       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-07-08 10:02         ` Michael Ellerman
     [not found]         ` <577f7a45.568f6b0a.bd0eb.4aa8SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2016-07-11 17:39           ` Simon Guo
2016-07-15  7:15           ` Simon Guo
2016-07-21 10:57             ` Michael Ellerman
     [not found]             ` <5790aa9c.05296b0a.adf58.5901SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2016-07-25  8:52               ` Simon Guo
2016-07-07 13:40       ` Laurent Dufour
2016-07-08  8:26         ` Michael Ellerman
2016-07-08  5:39       ` Simon Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1467897678.27157.45.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rashmicy@gmail.com \
    --cc=wei.guo.simon@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).