From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from host.buserror.net (host.buserror.net [209.198.135.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rlqMG44DrzDr30 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 06:43:06 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <1467924174.32358.69.camel@buserror.net> From: Scott Wood To: Arnd Bergmann , Yangbo Lu Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Mark Rutland , Ulf Hansson , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , Qiang Zhao , Russell King , Bhupesh Sharma , Joerg Roedel , Claudiu Manoil , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Kumar Gala , Rob Herring , Santosh Shilimkar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Xiaobo Xie , Yang-Leo Li , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:42:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4094106.qfxJu3tJbO@wuerfel> References: <1462417950-46796-1-git-send-email-yangbo.lu@nxp.com> <1465609853.22191.151.camel@buserror.net> <4094106.qfxJu3tJbO@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] soc: fsl: add GUTS driver for QorIQ platforms List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2016-07-07 at 10:30 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday, July 7, 2016 2:35:33 AM CEST Yangbo Lu wrote: > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > Could you reply when you see the email? > > If your method doesn’t resolve the problem, we still want to use our old > > patchset. > > > > This guts driver had been discussed about one year and blocked many > > workaround upstream. > > So please help to review and comment soon. > > > I don't really see how more discussion is going to help us here. I think > I've made it pretty clear that I don't want to see another platform > specific way to read an SoC revision and I've even sent a proof-of-concept > patch to show how the interface can work, now it's up to you to fit the > guts hardware into that and send a new patch series. In which relevant maintainership capacity are you NACKing it? -Scott