From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
kernellwp@gmail.com, jgross@suse.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
bsingharora@gmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
David.Laight@ACULAB.COM,
Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 01/11] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 04:11:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1477642287-24104-2-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477642287-24104-1-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This patch support to fix lock holder preemption issue.
For kernel users, we could use bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) to detech if
one vcpu is preempted or not.
The default implementation is a macro defined by false. So compiler can
wrap it out if arch dose not support such vcpu pteempted check.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 348f51b..44c1ce7 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -3506,6 +3506,18 @@ static inline void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+/*
+ * In order to deal with a various lock holder preemption issues provide an
+ * interface to see if a vCPU is currently running or not.
+ *
+ * This allows us to terminate optimistic spin loops and block, analogous to
+ * the native optimistic spin heuristic of testing if the lock owner task is
+ * running or not.
+ */
+#ifndef vcpu_is_preempted
+#define vcpu_is_preempted(cpu) false
+#endif
+
extern long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *new_mask);
extern long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask);
--
2.4.11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-28 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-28 8:11 [PATCH v6 00/11] implement vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 8:11 ` Pan Xinhui [this message]
2016-10-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() Pan Xinhui
2016-10-29 16:52 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-30 14:39 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex, rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] x86, paravirt: Add interface to support kvm/xen vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] KVM: Introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] x86, kvm/x86.c: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] x86, kernel/kvm.c: " Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] x86, xen: " Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 19:43 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-10-29 4:26 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] Documentation: virtual: kvm: Support " Pan Xinhui
2016-10-28 9:57 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] implement " Paolo Bonzini
2016-10-28 19:38 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-10-29 4:37 ` Pan Xinhui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1477642287-24104-2-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).