From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>,
Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>,
Christophe Lombard <clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Philippe Bergheaud <philippe.bergheaud@fr.ibm.com>,
Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] cxl: Do adapter fence check before handling afu interrupt
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:39:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479305373-20539-1-git-send-email-vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
If an afu interrupt is in flight when an eeh error is triggered the
control still reaches the function native_irq_multiplexed and the
PE-Handle read from the CXL_PSL_PEHandle_An register is 0xffff. The
function then erroneously assumes that the interrupt belonged to a
detached context and generates a warning with full stack dump in the
kernel log complaining:
"Unable to demultiplex CXL PSL IRQ for PE 65535 DSISR ffffffff DAR
ffffffff. (Possible AFU HW issue - was a term/remove acked with
outstanding transactions"
To fix this the patch adds new code to the function
native_irq_multiplexed function to compares the read value of register
CXL_PSL_PEHandle_An to ~0ULL. If true then logs a warning message
saying that the interrupt is being ignored and returns IRQ_HANDLED from
the irq handler.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/misc/cxl/native.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
index a217a74ccc98..c336350ede94 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
@@ -931,9 +931,18 @@ static irqreturn_t native_irq_multiplexed(int irq, void *data)
struct cxl_afu *afu = data;
struct cxl_context *ctx;
struct cxl_irq_info irq_info;
- int ph = cxl_p2n_read(afu, CXL_PSL_PEHandle_An) & 0xffff;
- int ret;
-
+ u64 phreg = cxl_p2n_read(afu, CXL_PSL_PEHandle_An);
+ int ph, ret;
+
+ /* check if eeh kicked in while the interrupt was in flight */
+ if (unlikely(phreg == ~0ULL)) {
+ dev_warn(&afu->dev,
+ "Ignoring slice interrupt(%d) due to fenced card",
+ irq);
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+ }
+ /* Mask the pe-handle from register value */
+ ph = phreg & 0xffff;
if ((ret = native_get_irq_info(afu, &irq_info))) {
WARN(1, "Unable to get CXL IRQ Info: %i\n", ret);
return fail_psl_irq(afu, &irq_info);
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2016-11-16 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-16 14:09 Vaibhav Jain [this message]
2016-11-22 0:34 ` cxl: Do adapter fence check before handling afu interrupt Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1479305373-20539-1-git-send-email-vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=imunsie@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=philippe.bergheaud@fr.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).