From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3tNhfD3n97zDvx6 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:35:16 +1100 (AEDT) Message-ID: <1479857716.6542.60.camel@neuling.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powernv: Clear SPRN_PSSCR when a POWER9 CPU comes online From: Michael Neuling To: Michael Ellerman , "Gautham R. Shenoy" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , "Shreyas B. Prabhu" Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:35:16 +1100 In-Reply-To: <87bmx7um7s.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> References: <1479838000-380-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87bmx7um7s.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 10:30 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > "Gautham R. Shenoy" writes: >=20 > > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" > >=20 > > Ensure that PSSCR is set to a safe value corresponding to no > > state-loss each time a POWER9 CPU comes online. >=20 > Is this a bug fix? I can't tell from the change log. There are no known bugs it's fixing. =C2=A0 It's just safer to run with a known default value, rather than what we rand= omly inherit from previous firmware. Mikey