From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pg0-x241.google.com (mail-pg0-x241.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::241])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3tbJ506HlGzDvr1
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:46:44 +1100 (AEDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x241.google.com with SMTP id 3so4413609pgd.0
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 21:46:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1481348777.28041.1.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] livepatch: hybrid consistency model
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>, Jiri
 Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>, Petr Mladek
 <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com>, Peter
 Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens
 <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski
 <luto@kernel.org>,  live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby
 <jslaby@suse.cz>,  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar
 <mingo@kernel.org>, Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:46:17 +1100
In-Reply-To: <cover.1481220077.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1481220077.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 12:08 -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Dusting the cobwebs off the consistency model again.  This is based on
> linux-next/master.
> 
> v1 was posted on 2015-02-09:
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1423499826.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
> 
> v2 was posted on 2016-04-28:
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1461875890.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
> 
> The biggest issue from v2 was finding a decent way to detect preemption
> and page faults on the stack of a sleeping task.  

Could you please elaborate on this? Preemption of a sleeping task and
faults as in the future (time) preemption and faults?

Balbir Singh.